Timeline for Accessing multiple dynamic libraries with the same extern C methods
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 19 at 19:00 | history | edited | Mast♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Jan 26, 2022 at 1:11 | history | edited | Deduplicator |
edited tags
|
|
| Jan 26, 2022 at 1:11 | history | rollback | Deduplicator |
Rollback to Revision 3
|
|
| Jan 25, 2022 at 15:53 | history | edited | Greg |
Tag update
|
|
| Jan 21, 2022 at 19:17 | vote | accept | Greg | ||
| Jan 20, 2022 at 17:01 | answer | added | JDługosz | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jan 19, 2022 at 18:49 | comment | added | Greg | With the real pre-compiled libraries I'm working with, they do share a common header file. However the header does use macros passed from command line. No particular reason for not using pure virtual other then I am rusty with my C++. I don't know of Boost.DLL but it looks like I can use the Linux version of it. | |
| Jan 19, 2022 at 12:38 | answer | added | Incomputable | timeline score: 5 | |
| Jan 19, 2022 at 10:36 | review | Close votes | |||
| Jan 28, 2022 at 9:44 | |||||
| Jan 19, 2022 at 9:19 | history | edited | Toby Speight | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Headings; fixed spelling/grammar/terminology
|
| Jan 19, 2022 at 9:11 | history | edited | user673679 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
spelling / grammar
|
| Jan 19, 2022 at 7:57 | comment | added | Incomputable | Do the classes share the same base class via sharing a header file? Why the functions were chosen to be not pure virtual? (I know that the program will crash if it is not loaded properly, but what can the program do if the library was not loaded?) Is there a reason why Boost.DLL is not an option? If possible, could you please edit the answers to my questions into your post, thank you. | |
| Jan 19, 2022 at 1:40 | history | asked | Greg | CC BY-SA 4.0 |