Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with deque
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 75307
For code for double ended queues, or code that wouldn't nearly be the same without a deque. Not for code that merely happens to use a deque incidentally but whose real focus is something else.
8
votes
Accepted
A simple thread-safe Deque in C++
::deque<T, Allocator> deque;
};
Technically, we do need to include <condition_variable>; we're not allowed to assume that <mutex> always pulls it in. … It's helpful to show that members are intentionally default-constructed, and it pacifies g++ -Weffc++:
std::deque<T> deque = {};
std::mutex mutex = {};
std::condition_variable condition = {}; …
- 81.7k