Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with generics
Search options not deleted
user 62560
Generic programming is a style of computer programming in which algorithms are written in terms of to-be-specified-later types that are then instantiated when needed for specific types provided as parameters.
4
votes
2
answers
7k
views
java.util.Observable but with generics to avoid casts
The difference is that it uses generics to avoid casts. The question is: Is it really worth the effort? What are the problems with this code? … import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Collection;
/**
* like java.util.Observable, But uses generics to avoid need for a cast. …
- 153
0
votes
1
answer
345
views
Does Java need an Observable object with generics?
The difference is that it uses generics to avoid casts.
There are two questions:
Is it really worth the effort? or it's just making things more complex than needed? … package cc.koosha.silkroad.lang;
import java.util.ArrayList;
import java.util.Collection;
/**
* like java.util.Observable, But uses generics to avoid need for a cast. …
- 153