Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with scala
Search options not deleted
user 20868
Scala is a general purpose programming language principally targeting the Java Virtual Machine. Designed to express common programming patterns in a concise, elegant, and type-safe way, it fuses both imperative and functional programming styles.
3
votes
Accepted
Improve scala functional string transformation
> def toUpper(s : String) = s.toUpperCase
toUpper: (s: String)String
scala> def reverse(s : String) = s.reverse
reverse: (s: String)String
And then, using the slightly modified version above:
scala … >
scala> transformString("blah")(reverse2)
res4: String = halb
Or even provide the lambda in-place:
scala> transformString("blah")(_ + "1", _.reverse)
res9: String = 1halb
IMO, varargs here work …
- 601
6
votes
2
answers
6k
views
Option type in C# and implicit conversions
It was mostly a fun exercise, but it might come in handy at work or any other project, even though it's less powerful than the Scala version. …
- 601