Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with performance
Search options not deleted
user 20868
Performance is a subset of Optimization: performance is the goal when you want the execution time of your program or routine to be optimal.
3
votes
Consuming an ASP.NET Web API call in an MVC controller
All the controlers are regular classes with methods.
Assuming your API controller StudentDashboard has a Get(string name) verb method, you can do this:
public ActionResult Index() //This view is str …
- 601
0
votes
Optimizing LINQ routines
The main thing I'd try hard to get rid of is the loop. Calling a DB in a loop is rarely a good idea.
First option might be to try to do an equivalent of IN query:
var ids = items.Select(x => x.confi …
- 601