Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with revealing-module-pattern
Search options answers only
not deleted
user 146022
This pattern is like the module pattern; it focuses on public & private methods. The difference is that the revealing module pattern was engineered as a way to ensure that all methods and variables are kept private until they are explicitly exposed; usually through an object literal returned by the closure in which it’s defined. It also allows the developer to avoid a lot of `this.` in the code.
1
vote
Accepted
Does my code follow good clean code conventions?
The most important part of Clean Code is that your code should be easily understood. The author's indication about the number of parameters of a function is meant to be something like: "Better no para …
- 126