Search Results
| Search type | Search syntax |
|---|---|
| Tags | [tag] |
| Exact | "words here" |
| Author |
user:1234 user:me (yours) |
| Score |
score:3 (3+) score:0 (none) |
| Answers |
answers:3 (3+) answers:0 (none) isaccepted:yes hasaccepted:no inquestion:1234 |
| Views | views:250 |
| Code | code:"if (foo != bar)" |
| Sections |
title:apples body:"apples oranges" |
| URL | url:"*.example.com" |
| Saves | in:saves |
| Status |
closed:yes duplicate:no migrated:no wiki:no |
| Types |
is:question is:answer |
| Exclude |
-[tag] -apples |
| For more details on advanced search visit our help page | |
Results tagged with reinventing-the-wheel
Search options not deleted
user 118085
For when you know you are reinventing the wheel, but are doing it anyways. Questions with this tag involve code that is already fully implemented (such as from a library).
15
votes
SHA-256 Implementation
On top of what Harith has already posted:
Your program isn't scalable
Hashing files is intended to work on files of any size. Your program implicitly assumes it will only be used with files that fit c …
- 451