Linq Zip came to mind in order to map the items in pairs and then apply the predicate. public static IEnumerable<T> WherePrevious<T>(this IEnumerable<T> collection, Func<T, T, bool> predicate) { if (collection == null) throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(collection)); if (predicate == null) throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(predicate)); return collection .Zip(collection.Skip(1), (previous, item) => (previous, item)) .Where(zip => predicate(zip.previous, zip.item)) .Select(zip => zip.item); } The following test was used to demonstrate the example given in the original question. [TestClass] public class FilterTest { [TestMethod] public void WherePreviousTest() { //Arrange var numbers = new[] { 1, 5, 8, 7, 12, 8, 5 }; var expected = new[] { 5, 8, 12 }; //Act var actual = numbers.WherePrevious((first, second) => second > first).ToArray(); //Assert actual.ShouldAllBeEquivalentTo(expected); } } The body of the created extension method could have been done on its own, but creating the extension method allowed for a cleaner approach. While I would say it is easier to read IMO, technically you will be enumerating the list more than once, which makes this not as efficient as your one pass through. That then lead me to rethink my approach. After reviewing the source code for [Enumerable.Zip](https://referencesource.microsoft.com/#System.Core/System/Linq/Enumerable.cs,2b8d0f02389aab71) and realizing your approach had the right idea I refactored the code to use the enumerator of the collection. public static IEnumerable<T> WherePrevious<T>(this IEnumerable<T> collection, Func<T, T, bool> predicate) { if (collection == null) throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(collection)); if (predicate == null) throw new ArgumentNullException(nameof(predicate)); return WherePreviousIterator(collection, predicate); } private static IEnumerable<T> WherePreviousIterator<T>(IEnumerable<T> collection, Func<T, T, bool> predicate) { using (var e = collection.GetEnumerator()) { if (e.MoveNext()) { var previous = e.Current; while (e.MoveNext()) { var item = e.Current; if (predicate(previous, item)) yield return item; previous = item; } } yield break; } } Which actually performed not that much better than the previous suggestion using Zip when run against the same test above.