# Flattening a dictionary into a string

Given:

k = {'MASTER_HOST': '10.178.226.196', 'MASTER_PORT': 9999}


I want to flatten into the string:

"MASTER_HOST='10.178.226.196', MASTER_PORT=9999"


This is the ugly way that I'm achieving this right now:

result = []
for i,j in k.iteritems():
if isinstance(j, int):
result.append('%s=%d' % (i,j))
else:
result.append("%s='%s'" % (i,j))

', '.join(result)


I'm sure my developer colleagues are going to chastize me for this code. Surely there is a better way.

• I don't think it's that bad, unless perhaps you also have Boolean values in your dict, because isinstance(False, int) returns True, so instead of flag='False', you'd get flag=0 (both of which are not optimal). – Tim Pietzcker Jan 19 '12 at 9:00

For python 3.0+ (as @Serdalis suggested)

', '.join("{!s}={!r}".format(key,val) for (key,val) in k.items())


Older versions:

', '.join("%s=%r" % (key,val) for (key,val) in k.iteritems())

• Close but no cigar. I don't want quotes around 9999 for MASTER_PORT in the final result. – Bon Ami Jan 19 '12 at 8:53
• @BonAmi You're right. I replaced the second %s with %r to achieve that – Dor Shemer Jan 19 '12 at 8:57
• Instead of the (key,val) you could simply write item. iteritems returns tuples, and if you have multiple replacements in a string, you replace those using a tuple. You drop a second temporary variable and imo, you gain some readability. – Elmer Jan 19 '12 at 9:31
• @Elmer That's interesting you say that, because I think novice pythoners might get more readability by using (key,val), since it explains better what happens. But I guess that's a matter of taste. I do agree your way is more efficient. – Dor Shemer Jan 19 '12 at 9:34
• I know it's a dictionary and .iteritems returns (key, val), so unless you have better variable names that warrant creating temporary variables, like (food_name, price), you can save yourself the characters. It's all about increasing your signal to noise, and (k,v) or (key, value) is mostly noise. – IceArdor Sep 18 '15 at 6:35

Dor Shemer's method is very good, however since 3.0+ came out, pythoneque? language is moving towards:

', '.join("{!s}={!r}".format(k,v) for (k,v) in k.items())


using .format instead of % () to format a string.

both will give the same result and are correct.

I used items for python 3.0+, but for python 2.x use iteritems

• You're right. I keep thinking with python 2.6 – Dor Shemer Jan 19 '12 at 9:00
• new syntax 3.6: f"this is a string {variable}" – JinSnow Feb 5 '17 at 20:18

If you want exactly that output format, your way is quite OK imo. Because you want your keys unquoted and your values quoted if they're strings and unquoted if they're just numbers, there is no 'easy way' I think

In general str(k) will return a string like {'MASTER_HOST': '10.178.226.196', 'MASTER_PORT': 9999}

For python 3.6+ you can use f-strings:

', '.join(f'{k}_{v}' for k, v in my_dict.items())

• Nice! Do you think you can improve the efficiency a little? – Chocolate Feb 18 at 0:38