3
\$\begingroup\$

I am building a small DSL for iOS' autolayout feature. Obviously I want to have a typesafe way to define autolayouts instead of doing VSL. I came up with the following:

//in reality this will be a Xamarin/iOS View
type View = 
     | View

type Constraint = 
     | Max of int
     | Min of int
     | Eq of int
     | Both of int * int

type Element =
     | Gap of Constraint
     | Part of View * Constraint

let horizontal superview : Element list = []

let max v = Max v
let min v = Min v
let eq v = Eq v
let minmax min max = Both(min, max)

let gap c es = Gap c :: es
let view v c es = Part (v, c) :: es

//transform needs to implement the real autolayouting.
//not yet done
let transform es = List.rev es

let super_view, left_view, middle_view, right_view = View, View, View, View

horizontal super_view
    |> gap (min 20)
    |> view left_view (min 20)
    |> gap (max 30)
    |> view middle_view (eq 45)
    |> gap (eq 50)
    |> view right_view (minmax 20 100)
    |> gap (max 0)
    |> transform

I am sort of content with the design so far; for example, it has a pretty "fluid" touch to it. However I am asking myself if there are better ways to do it.

One particular issue is the simple fact that every definition is a intersection of "gaps" and "views" starting with a "gap" and ending with a "gap". Is there a possibility to "encode" such a design into types instead of doing it via runtime exceptions (which I would do now).

\$\endgroup\$
1

0

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.