The problem comes from codility, whose coding problems I'm starting to enjoy as their evaluation criteria really looks at runtime.
Task description
A non-empty zero-indexed array
A
consisting ofN
integers is given. The consecutive elements of arrayA
represent consecutive cars on a road.Array
A
contains only 0s and/or 1s:
- 0 represents a car traveling east,
- 1 represents a car traveling west.
The goal is to count passing cars. We say that a pair of cars (P, Q), where 0 ≤ P < Q <
N
, is passing when P is traveling to the east and Q is traveling to the west.For example, consider array
A
such that:A[0] = 0 A[1] = 1 A[2] = 0 A[3] = 1 A[4] = 1
We have five pairs of passing cars: (0, 1), (0, 3), (0, 4), (2, 3), (2, 4).
Write a function:
def solution(a)
that, given a non-empty zero-indexed array
A
ofN
integers, returns the number of passing cars.The function should return −1 if the number of passing cars exceeds 1,000,000,000.
For example, given:
A[0] = 0 A[1] = 1 A[2] = 0 A[3] = 1 A[4] = 1
the function should return 5, as explained above.
Assume that:
N
is an integer within the range [1..100,000];- each element of array
A
is an integer that can have one of the following values: 0, 1.Complexity:
- expected worst-case time complexity is \$O(N)\$;
- expected worst-case space complexity is \$O(1)\$, beyond input storage (not counting the storage required for input arguments).
Elements of input arrays can be modified.
Solution
I've tried my hand at 2 different solutions, one where I delete elements from the array but that was slower than my first pass like this:
def solution(a)
results = 0
a.each_with_index do |el, i|
if el == 0
j = i
while j <= a.size-1
results += 1 if a[j] != 0
j += 1
end
end
return -1 if results > 1000000000
end
results
end
I understand why this is \$O(n^2)\$, but I'm unsure how to make this faster.
Fixnum
toBignum
after a certain machine-dependent threshold, andBignum
s can hold arbitrarily large numbers (limited by machine memory). \$\endgroup\$