FizzBuzz example in Python for game manual

Question

I'm developing an implementation of the FizzBuzz game as part of an edutainment game for a retro video game platform. In its manual, I want to mention the history of writing a bot for the FizzBuzz game as a programmer screening test since Jeff Atwood's blog post, including sample answers in a few popular programming languages. But I don't want to confuse readers with poorly written code.

So is there anything unclear or unpythonic about my approach to FizzBuzz?

# Each of several divisors has a name. For each number,
# print the names of all divisors that divide the number,
# if any.  Otherwise print the number itself.
divs = [
    (3, "fizz"),
    (5, "buzz"),
]
for n in range(1, 101):
    # Make a string containing names of divisors of n
    ndivs = ''.join(name for (divisor, name) in divs
                    if n % divisor == 0)
    # If the string is empty, print the number instead
    print(ndivs or n)

Answer 1

I think the naming used here is a little confusing for new coders.

The name div would be read as a divisor, and elements called divisor are then extracted from it.

Perhaps use something with more clear indication of what it is, like divsor_pairs or divsor_names

divsor_pairs = [
    (3, "fizz"),
    (5, "buzz"),
]
for index in range(1, 101):
    divsor_output = ''.join(name for (divisor, name) in divsor_pairs
                    if index % divisor == 0)
    print(divsor_output or index)

Answer 2

Nicely done! The great thing about this implementation that it's easy to extend (for example if you want to add (7, "jazz"). I have only some minor nitpicks.

Tuples are immutable, as opposed to lists. Since the list of fizz-buzz-jazz definitions don't change during the run of the program, the divs list can be a tuple. Tuples are faster than lists.

divs = (
    (3, "fizz"),
    (5, "buzz"),
)

The parentheses are unnecessary around (divisor, name):

ndivs = ''.join(name for (divisor, name) in divs
                if n % divisor == 0)

This may be a matter of taste, but I'd find this line more readable on a single line:

ndivs = ''.join(name for divisor, name in divs if n % divisor == 0)