I wrote a function that inserts or updates a Map key value depending on whether the key is already in the map. If it is, then the value gets added to the already existing map's value.

import Data.Map as Map

updateMap :: (Ord k, Num v) => k -> v -> Map k v -> Map k v
updateMap k v map = if member k map then Map.adjust (+ v) k map
                    else Map.insert k v map 

Tests

*Main> updateMap 1 1 $ Map.singleton 1 100
fromList [(1,101)]
*Main> updateMap 2 1 $ Map.singleton 1 100
fromList [(1,100),(2,1)]
*Main> updateMap 1 33 $ Map.singleton 1 100
fromList [(1,133)]

Please critique.

up vote 13 down vote accepted
updateMapPF :: (Ord k, Num a) => k -> a -> Map k a -> Map k a
updateMapPF = Map.insertWith (+)

λ> updateMapPF 1 1 $ Map.singleton 1 100
fromList [(1,101)]
λ> updateMapPF 2 1 $ Map.singleton 1 100
fromList [(1,100),(2,1)]
λ> updateMapPF 1 33 $ Map.singleton 1 100
fromList [(1,133)]

Process:

Notice the use of Map.insert

Notice that you are mapping (+) over the possibility of having or not having a value

Notice that Data.Map has a function for applying functions to values, called Data.Map.insertWith. It's extremely common for collections to have a helper function for "insert data with a helper function / default value"

Notice the shared structure of the types of your function and insertWith

insertWith :: Ord k => (a -> a -> a) -> k -> a -> Map k a -> Map k a

updateMap  :: (Ord k, Num v) =>         k -> v -> Map k v -> Map k v

Realize that applying (+) to insertWith will make the types identical

λ> :t insertWith

insertWith
  :: Ord k => (a -> a -> a) -> k -> a -> Map k a -> Map k a

λ> :t insertWith (+)

insertWith (+) :: (Ord k, Num a) => k -> a -> Map k a -> Map k a

Validate assumptions with specific examples, more rigor is available with the use of QuickCheck.

λ> updateMapPF 1 1 $ Map.singleton 1 100
fromList [(1,101)]

λ> updateMapPF 2 1 $ Map.singleton 1 100
fromList [(1,100),(2,1)]

λ> updateMapPF 1 33 $ Map.singleton 1 100
fromList [(1,133)]

This is a practically golden opportunity to demonstrate how eta reduction can simplify code and kill off redundant logic.

Your Answer

 
discard

By clicking "Post Your Answer", you acknowledge that you have read our updated terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy, and that your continued use of the website is subject to these policies.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.