17
\$\begingroup\$

The following code sorts an HTML table with JavaScript (without using any external libraries like jQuery). Are there any shortcomings or possible improvements I could make?

<html>

<head>
    <meta http-equiv="content-type" content="text/html;charset=Windows-1252">
    <script type="text/javascript">
        var people, asc1 = 1,
            asc2 = 1,
            asc3 = 1;
        window.onload = function () {
            people = document.getElementById("people");
        }

        function sort_table(tbody, col, asc) {
            var rows = tbody.rows,
                rlen = rows.length,
                arr = new Array(),
                i, j, cells, clen;
            // fill the array with values from the table
            for (i = 0; i < rlen; i++) {
                cells = rows[i].cells;
                clen = cells.length;
                arr[i] = new Array();
                for (j = 0; j < clen; j++) {
                    arr[i][j] = cells[j].innerHTML;
                }
            }
            // sort the array by the specified column number (col) and order (asc)
            arr.sort(function (a, b) {
                return (a[col] == b[col]) ? 0 : ((a[col] > b[col]) ? asc : -1 * asc);
            });
            // replace existing rows with new rows created from the sorted array
            for (i = 0; i < rlen; i++) {
                rows[i].innerHTML = "<td>" + arr[i].join("</td><td>") + "</td>";
            }
        }
    </script>
    <style type="text/css">
        table {
            border-collapse: collapse;
            border: none;
        }
        th,
        td {
            border: 1px solid black;
            padding: 4px 16px;
            font-family: Times New Roman;
            font-size: 24px;
            text-align: left;
        }
        th {
            background-color: #C8C8C8;
            cursor: pointer;
        }
    </style>
</head>

<body>
    <table>
        <thead>
            <tr>
                <th onclick="sort_table(people, 0, asc1); asc1 *= -1; asc2 = 1; asc3 = 1;">Name</th>
                <th onclick="sort_table(people, 1, asc2); asc2 *= -1; asc3 = 1; asc1 = 1;">Surname</th>
                <th onclick="sort_table(people, 2, asc3); asc3 *= -1; asc1 = 1; asc2 = 1;">Age</th>
            </tr>
        </thead>
        <tbody id="people">
            <tr>
                <td>Raja</td>
                <td>Dey</td>
                <td>18</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
                <td>Mamata</td>
                <td>Sharma</td>
                <td>20</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
                <td>Avijit</td>
                <td>Sharma</td>
                <td>21</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
                <td>Sharanya</td>
                <td>Dutta</td>
                <td>26</td>
            </tr>
            <tr>
                <td>Nabin</td>
                <td>Roy</td>
                <td>27</td>
            </tr>
        </tbody>
    </table>
</body>

</html>

\$\endgroup\$
5
  • 5
    \$\begingroup\$ Is the code otherwise working? If you're looking for just feedback, you should post to Code Review instead. \$\endgroup\$
    – JJJ
    Commented Dec 17, 2013 at 9:37
  • \$\begingroup\$ Why not use Jquery. You can use tablesorter plugin. tablesorter.com/docs/example-pager.html \$\endgroup\$
    – Anup
    Commented Dec 17, 2013 at 10:14
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ His code is working (it only had a misconfiguration on jsfiddle: jsfiddle ) and he is asking for performance tips. @Anup : (without any external library like JQuery) \$\endgroup\$
    – ProGM
    Commented Dec 17, 2013 at 10:20
  • \$\begingroup\$ Instead of -1 * asc, use just -asc. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Nov 8, 2016 at 18:56
  • \$\begingroup\$ Why not using UTF-8 instead of this weird charset? \$\endgroup\$
    – gouessej
    Commented Nov 22, 2016 at 10:53

5 Answers 5

11
\$\begingroup\$

To speed up the sorting you first have to find what is consuming time. In your case the slower part of your code is:

for(i = 0; i < rlen; i++){
    rows[i].innerHTML = "<td>"+arr[i].join("</td><td>")+"</td>";
}

The reason is that the DOM elaboration is time consuming for the browser.

Here's an updated version that minimizes the access to the DOM:

function sort_table(tbody, col, asc){
    var rows = tbody.rows, rlen = rows.length, arr = new Array(), i, j, cells, clen;
    // fill the array with values from the table
    for(i = 0; i < rlen; i++){
    cells = rows[i].cells;
    clen = cells.length;
    arr[i] = new Array();
        for(j = 0; j < clen; j++){
        arr[i][j] = cells[j].innerHTML;
        }
    }
    // sort the array by the specified column number (col) and order (asc)
    arr.sort(function(a, b){
        return (a[col] == b[col]) ? 0 : ((a[col] > b[col]) ? asc : -1*asc);
    });
    for(i = 0; i < rlen; i++){
        arr[i] = "<td>"+arr[i].join("</td><td>")+"</td>";
    }
    tbody.innerHTML = "<tr>"+arr.join("</tr><tr>")+"</tr>";
}

Proof: http://jsperf.com/table-sorting-stack-overflow

\$\endgroup\$
1
  • \$\begingroup\$ why is your method slower than op s method on firefox 61 osx 10.14 lol \$\endgroup\$
    – PirateApp
    Commented Jul 10, 2018 at 14:38
6
\$\begingroup\$

I ran into some trouble with ProGM's solution.

  1. It didn't take numerical sorting into account.
  2. IE did NOT like setting this line: tbody.innerHTML = "<tr>"+arr.join("</tr><tr>")+"</tr>";
  3. It would destroy any attributes assigned to any part of the table (css class names and etc)

I have made adjustments:

function sort_table(tbody, col, asc)
{
    var rows = tbody.rows;
    var rlen = rows.length;
    var arr = new Array();
    var i, j, cells, clen;
    // fill the array with values from the table
    for(i = 0; i < rlen; i++)
    {
        cells = rows[i].cells;
        clen = cells.length;
        arr[i] = new Array();
      for(j = 0; j < clen; j++) { arr[i][j] = cells[j].innerHTML; }
    }
    // sort the array by the specified column number (col) and order (asc)
    arr.sort(function(a, b)
    {
        var retval=0;
        var fA=parseFloat(a[col]);
        var fB=parseFloat(b[col]);
        if(a[col] != b[col])
        {
            if((fA==a[col]) && (fB==b[col]) ){ retval=( fA > fB ) ? asc : -1*asc; } //numerical
            else { retval=(a[col] > b[col]) ? asc : -1*asc;}
        }
        return retval;      
    });
    for(var rowidx=0;rowidx<rlen;rowidx++)
    {
        for(var colidx=0;colidx<arr[rowidx].length;colidx++){ tbody.rows[rowidx].cells[colidx].innerHTML=arr[rowidx][colidx]; }
    }
}

To address point #1, I added in the calls to parseFloat() and then compared the result the original value (You change to checking if it produces NaN instead). If both values are numeric, they compared via numerical preference and not by their string versions.

For points #2 and #3, I solved it via the same set of code. Instead of destroying the whole table body by setting the innerHTML, I change the individual cell contents to the new sorted values:

for(var rowidx=0;rowidx<rlen;rowidx++)
{
    for(var colidx=0;colidx<arr[rowidx].length;colidx++)
    { 
        tbody.rows[rowidx].cells[colidx].innerHTML=arr[rowidx][colidx]; 
    }
}

That only works if yours all have the same number of columns, but if you do not, sorting is much more complex anyway.

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ will you explain the adjustments please and how they overcome the issues that you found? \$\endgroup\$
    – Malachi
    Commented Nov 10, 2014 at 17:12
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ Can do, I also found a mistake in mine. \$\endgroup\$
    – Plater
    Commented Nov 11, 2014 at 13:51
4
\$\begingroup\$

Here is the pure JS for sorting table data. I used first column which holds numbers. You have to modify column index and condition statement as per your requirements. I hope that solves your problem...

    // Table data sorting starts....
    function sortData() {
        // Read table body node.
        var tableData = document.getElementById('data_table').getElementsByTagName('tbody').item(0);

        // Read table row nodes.
        var rowData = tableData.getElementsByTagName('tr'); 

        for(var i = 0; i < rowData.length - 1; i++) {
            for(var j = 0; j < rowData.length - (i + 1); j++) {

                //Swap row nodes if short condition matches
                if(parseInt(rowData.item(j).getElementsByTagName('td').item(0).innerHTML) > parseInt(rowData.item(j+1).getElementsByTagName('td').item(0).innerHTML)) {
                    tableData.insertBefore(rowData.item(j+1),rowData.item(j));
                }
            }
        }
    }
    // Table data sorting ends....

HTML Table:

<table id="data_table" width="200" border="1">
    <tbody>
    <tr>
        <td width="100">01</td>
        <td>aaa</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>04</td>
        <td>ddd</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>05</td>
        <td>eee</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>03</td>
        <td>ccc</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>02</td>
        <td>bbb</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>06</td>
        <td>fff</td>
    </tr>
    </tbody>
</table>

HTML Table: Sorted

<table id="data_table" width="200" border="1">
    <tbody>
    <tr>
        <td width="100">01</td>
        <td>aaa</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>02</td>
        <td>bbb</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>03</td>
        <td>ccc</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>04</td>
        <td>ddd</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>05</td>
        <td>eee</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
        <td>06</td>
        <td>fff</td>
    </tr>
    </tbody>
</table>

Here is demo.

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • \$\begingroup\$ This whole answer is all jquery. Although I think it's great you answered, the OP was asking specifically for non jquery solutions. \$\endgroup\$
    – dreza
    Commented Dec 21, 2013 at 5:33
  • \$\begingroup\$ Here you go. Pure JS code for sorting HTML nodes. You can see the demo on given link. \$\endgroup\$
    – Airan
    Commented Dec 22, 2013 at 11:18
3
\$\begingroup\$

I was working on a table sorting script in ES6 today, researching the various methods to determine the most efficient. I dismissed working with the innerHTML property out of hand, from previous research, instead trying a series of options using:

  1. insertRow() & deleteRow()
  2. appendChild() & removeChild()
  3. append() / prepend() & remove()

with the latter coming out as the fastest in my tests on tables with a large number (>5000) of rows.

Given that, here is the code I came up with, integrated into your use case.

(()=>{
    let people=document.getElementById("people"),
        thead=people.previousElementSibling,
        rows=[...people.rows],
        orders=[1,1,-1],
        sort=(col)=>{
            let x=rows.length;
            rows.sort((a,b)=>{
                let i=a.children[col].firstChild.nodeValue,
                    j=b.children[col].firstChild.nodeValue;
                return i===j?0:i>j?orders[col]:-orders[col];
            });
            orders[col]*=-1;
            while(people.lastChild)
                people.lastChild.remove();
            while(x--)
                people.prepend(rows[x]);
        };
    thead.addEventListener("click",event=>{
        let target=event.target;
        if(target.nodeName.toLowerCase()==="th")
            sort(target.cellIndex);
    },0);
})();
table{
  border-collapse:collapse;
  border:none;
}
th,td{
  border:1px solid black;
  padding:4px 16px;
  font-family:Times New Roman;
  font-size:24px;
  text-align:left;
}
th{
  background-color:#C8C8C8;
  cursor:pointer;
}
<table>
  <thead>
    <tr>
      <th>Name</th>
      <th>Surname</th>
      <th>Age</th>
    </tr>
  </thead>
  <tbody id="people">
    <tr>
      <td>Raja</td>
      <td>Dey</td>
      <td>18</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Mamata</td>
      <td>Sharma</td>
      <td>20</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Avijit</td>
      <td>Sharma</td>
      <td>21</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Sharanya</td>
      <td>Dutta</td>
      <td>26</td>
    </tr>
    <tr>
      <td>Nabin</td>
      <td>Roy</td>
      <td>27</td>
    </tr>
  </tbody>
</table>

\$\endgroup\$
3
  • \$\begingroup\$ Thank you. I just converted your script into Javascript of "nowadays", I used ".tHead" on the table object instead of previousElementSibling and I added a null check because a.children[col].firstChild.nodeValue can be null when a cell is empty. I'm going to compute the content of "orders". \$\endgroup\$
    – gouessej
    Commented Nov 17, 2016 at 16:33
  • \$\begingroup\$ prepend is an experimental feature not supported by Microsoft Edge. Array.from() isn't supported by Microsoft Internet Explorer. \$\endgroup\$
    – gouessej
    Commented Nov 22, 2016 at 10:55
  • \$\begingroup\$ I modified the loop in order to use appendChild() instead of prepend(), I used removeChild() instead of remove() and I replaced Array.from by a simple creation of an array and a loop to copy the elements one by one. Now, it works in Mozilla Firefox, Google Chrome & Chromium, Microsoft Edge and Microsoft Internet Explorer. \$\endgroup\$
    – gouessej
    Commented Nov 22, 2016 at 14:06
1
\$\begingroup\$

Here is an improved version based on Plater's anwser. Just in case there is DOM elements inside of td tags, the code gets the last child of the cell and get the value, and apply a customized filter to it.

Note: The customized filter here is just an example, and also you don't need to get the last child of the td tags, and it can be any child of your use case.

function sortTable(tbody, col, asc) {
  var rows = tbody.rows;
  var rlen = rows.length;
  var arr = new Array();
  var i, j, cells, clen;
  /* fill the array with values from the table */
  for (i = 0; i < rlen; i++) {
    cells = rows[i].cells;
    clen = cells.length;
    arr[i] = new Array();
    for (j = 0; j < clen; j++) {
      arr[i][j] = cells[j].innerHTML;
    }
  }
  /* sort the array by the specified column number (col) and order (asc) */
  arr.sort(function(a, b) {
    var retval = 0;
    var aVal = getDomValue(a[col]);
    var bVal = getDomValue(b[col]);
    var fA = parseFloat(aVal);
    var fB = parseFloat(bVal);
    if (aVal != bVal) {

      if ((fA == aVal) && (fB == bVal)) {
        retval = (fA > fB) ? asc : -1 * asc;
      } // Numerical
      else {
        retval = (aVal > bVal) ? asc : -1 * asc;
      } // String
    }
    return retval;
  });
  /* fill the table with sorted values */
  for (var rowidx = 0; rowidx < rlen; rowidx++) {
    for (var colidx = 0; colidx < arr[rowidx].length; colidx++) {
      tbody.rows[rowidx].cells[colidx].innerHTML = arr[rowidx][colidx];
    }
  }

}

function getDomValue(domString) {
  var value;
  var parser = new DOMParser();
  var element = parser.parseFromString(domString, 'text/xml');
  var content = element.lastChild.innerHTML;

  // Custom filter just in case if there is elements inside of the td.
  // I made two filters to standardize numbers like '$20,000', also I
  // treat whereas ' ' space as '0'
  if (content === ' ') content = content.replace(' ', '0');
  if (content.indexOf('$') !== -1) {
    content = content.replace('$', '');
    content = content.replace(',', '');
  }
  value = isNaN(parseFloat(content)) ? content : parseFloat(content);
  return value;
}

\$\endgroup\$

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.