# Problem Description

I am building a library that helps me building TUI Apps more faster, for example printing TUI Menus and other components. I would like to get feedback on my design decisions to see if I'm properly following SOLID principles.

To solve this scenario while trying to follow the principles I created a class called TUIMenu that has the responsibility of giving access the object properties and methods. Then I created another class named TUIMenuPrinter that has the responsibility of printing a TUIMenu with a specified format.

All is working correctly, but even with this division of responsibility I found a little bit tedious to create a TUIMenu object and then creating a TUIMenuPrinter object to pass as a parameter the previous TUIMenu object. So I would like to know what do you think, is this solution has a good design or maybe I should improve in something. I was also thinking about implementing the TUIMenuPrinter as a Inner Class or a Static Class, so I don't need to instantiate another object.

# Current Solution Code

UIMenu class

using System.Collections.Generic;

namespace CLILibrary
{
{
public string Title { get; set; }
public List<string> MenuRows { get; }

public void AppendLine(string line)
{
}
}
}


UIMenuPrinter class

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Text;
using CLITools;

namespace CLILibrary.UIComponentPrinters
{
{

public char FrameDecorationChar { get; set; } = '=';
public char SeparationChar { get; set; } = ' ';
public char RowDecorationChar { get; set; } = '|';

{
}

public override void Print()
{
var values = new Stack<string>();
var stringMeter = new StringMeter(values);
var largestStringSize = stringMeter.MeasureLargestString();
var largestString = (largestStringSize >= 40) ? largestStringSize : 40;

StringBuilder formatBuilder = new StringBuilder();

var frameDecorationLine = StringRepeater.Repeat(FrameDecorationChar.ToString(), (int) largestString);
var spacesLine = StringRepeater.Repeat(SeparationChar.ToString(), (int) largestString);

formatBuilder.Append(SeparationChar).Append(frameDecorationLine).Append(SeparationChar);

formatBuilder.AppendLine();

formatBuilder.Append(RowDecorationChar).Append(spacesLine).Append(RowDecorationChar).AppendLine();
formatBuilder.Append(RowDecorationChar).Append(spacesLine).Append(RowDecorationChar).AppendLine();

formatBuilder.Append(SeparationChar).Append(frameDecorationLine).Append(SeparationChar).AppendLine();

{
formatBuilder.Append(RowDecorationChar).Append(_FillRow(Row, (int) largestString)).Append(RowDecorationChar).AppendLine();
});

formatBuilder.Append(SeparationChar).Append(frameDecorationLine).Append(SeparationChar).AppendLine();

Console.WriteLine(formatBuilder.ToString());
}

private string _FillRow(string row, int limitLength)
{
return \$"{row}{StringRepeater.Repeat(SeparationChar.ToString(), limitLength - row.Length)}";
}

{
{
propertiesStack.Push(Row);
}

}
}
}


SandBox Console Application for Basic Testing Code

using System;
using CLILibrary;
using CLILibrary.UIComponentPrinters;
using CLITools;

namespace SandBox
{
internal class Program
{
public static void Main(string[] args)
{

{
Title = "Do you like to drink coffee?"
};

}
}
}


## Extra Details

• I have one class that is an Abstract Class named UIControl that is the Parent of all the specific UI Components like UIMenu is.

• Also with the UIPrinter object I have a Parent of all the Component Printers, its name is UIComponentPrinter.

## UPDATE

Officially this is considered as a TUI, so I changed all my object names.

TUI (Text-based user interface) - similar to GUI, but instead of graphics, interface is drawn by text (mostly ASCII) symbols. Examples: Vim, Mutt

Someone asked me for the library code where I define the StringMeter and the StringRepeater, so here is the code :D

### StringMeter Code

using System;
using System.Collections.Generic;
using System.Linq;

namespace CLITools
{
public class StringMeter
{
private IEnumerable<string> _strings;

public IEnumerable<string> Strings
{
get => _strings;
set => _strings = value ?? throw new ArgumentException(nameof(_strings));
}

public StringMeter(IEnumerable<string> strings)
{
Strings = strings;
}

public double MeasureLargestString()
{
double largestStr = 0;

Strings.ToList().ForEach(eachString =>
{
if (!(eachString.Length > largestStr)) return;
largestStr = eachString.Length;
});

return largestStr;
}

public double MeasureSmallestString()
{
double smallestString = double.MaxValue;

Strings.ToList().ForEach(eachString =>
{
if (eachString.Length > smallestString) return;
smallestString = eachString.Length;
});

return smallestString;
}
}
}


### StringRepeater Code

using System.Text;

namespace CLITools
{
public class StringRepeater
{
public static string Repeat(string value, int count)
{
return new StringBuilder(value.Length * count).Insert(0, value, count).ToString();
}
}
}


As you can see this code is part of another project that I have (Class Library) called CLITools.

• Can UIMenuPrinter be a static class? Then: MenuPrinter.Print( thisMenu );. Keeping a reference to the menu is not necessary. Oct 4 at 18:51
• Which library defines the StringMeter and StringRepeater? I suppose they are coming form the CliTools, but there are multiple nugets with such naming. Are you using Syroot.CliTools? Oct 5 at 6:52
• This looks more like a TUI than a CLI. Asking lots of questions is pretty much the opposite of specifying everything as command arguments. Oct 5 at 8:34
• @radarbob I'd avoid that: there is a lot of logic I want to test in UIMenuPrinter (I'd call it presenter but that's another story) and having a static class will make it WAY harder than it has to be (plus I may want to have different presenters for file output vs ANSI terminal vs old terminal vs...) Oct 5 at 14:35
• @PeterCsala Hi there! In this case, that is not a Nuget Package I updated the question with the code from StringRepeater and StringMeter. Oct 5 at 16:15

Here are my observations:

### UIMenu

• Try to use consistent naming
• Your current naming: Title, MenuRows, AppendLine
• Suggested naming #1: Title, Items, AddItem
• Suggested naming #2: MenuHeader, MenuRows, AddMenuRow
• You don't need the parameterless ctor
• You can simply initialize the MenuRows when you declare it
public List<string> MenuRows { get; } = new List<string>();

• I would also suggest to consider a method which can receive multiple menu items, not just one

### StringRepeater

• Your class could be marked as static, since it has only static members
• The code is quite error-prone since it does not check the parameters
• if value is null >> NullReferenceException at value.Length
• if count is negative >> ArgumentOutOfRangeException at new StringBuilder(

### StringMeter

• _strings = value ?? throw new ArgumentException(nameof(_strings))
• It is better to perform the validation before calling the setter
• You are revealing an implementation detail to the caller nameof(_strings)
• You are calling the ToList each and every time when you access the _strings
• It might make more sense to store it as List
• Strings declared as public even though it is used only from the class itself
• MeasureXYZ return double even though a string length can be only a positive integer
• There implementations are too lengthy, they can be implemented as simple LINQ queries
public class StringMeter
{

public StringMeter(IEnumerable<string> strings)
=> CollectionOfStrings = strings?.ToList() ?? throw new ArgumentException(nameof(strings));

public int MeasureLargestString()
=> CollectionOfStrings.Select(s => s.Length).OrderByDescending(l => l).First();

public int MeasureSmallestString()
=> CollectionOfStrings.Select(s => s.Length).OrderBy(l => l).First();
}


### UIMenuPrinter

• FrameDecorationChar ... I know naming is hard but do not suffix the properties with the data type
• Suggestions: FrameDecorator, Separator and RowDecorator
• I think if you change your API in the way that Print method anticipates a UIMenu instance, not the ctor, then a single Printer instance can be reused
• This whole logic with Stack is an overkill
• The same can be achieved with this simple LINQ
uiMenu.MenuRows.Concat(new[] { uiMenu.Title }).Reverse()

• largestStringSize >= 40 rather than hard coding magic numbers I would suggest to make it as a parameter with default value
• formatBuilder yet again naming ... Try to capture the purpose of the variable, like menuBuilder, textualMenuVisualizer
• _FillRow In C# it is pretty uncommon to start with underscore a private method
• better to perform the validation before calling the setter. Maybe not. The class is calling its own setter but the finer point is to make constructors! In this case the setter is the constructor in essence, with the added bonus that any external object can make any change at any time to any value. Oct 7 at 18:09
• @radarbob Valid point. Thanks for sharing it. Oct 8 at 7:31
• Your LINQ suggestions need a .DefaultIfEmpty to avoid throwing when the collection is empty :)
– RobH
Oct 8 at 9:19
• @RobH Or FirstOfDefault would also provide more robustness. Oct 8 at 9:22
• @PeterCsala - yeah, the defaults applied in OPs code are a bit odd but FirstOrDefault would be great for what I think the default should really be!
– RobH
Oct 8 at 9:30
mainMenu.AppendLine("[1] Yes");


This part is in need of some improvements.

AppendLine is not a descriptive enough name. AddOption, AddChoice, AddMenuItem, ... would be better.

One thing I also suspect is that you probably haven't though through the actual selection logic yet. You've encoded the input values (1, 2) into the string, which is inherently going to lead to DRY violations when you have to write the subsequent logic for checking which value the user has put in.

Additionally, you've also encoded your UI formatting (the [] brackets), but deciding what things should look like is really the responsibility of the UIMenuPrinter.
Additionally, because you are hardcoding the formatting, your UI can't account for e.g. longer numbers, and being able to print all the [] brackets using the same (max) width.

Taking these things into account, a much cleaner interface would be:

    mainMenu.AddChoice( 1 , "Yes"); // input value = int


Whether the input value is an int, or if you'll allow any char or even a string is up to you to decide.

var uiMenuPrinter = new UIMenuPrinter(mainMenu);


You've invariably tied a single printer to a single menu. That is impeding your ability to reuse the same printer across an application, which would be really helpful to ensure a consistent UI across the application.

A better interface would be:

var uiMenuPrinter = new UIMenuPrinter();

if(mainMenuChoice == 1) // just an example


var mainMenu = new UIMenu
{
Title = "Do you like to drink coffee?"
};

// ...



Either favor object initializers or don't; but I suggest not mixing and matching as you go, because it will detract from your style and readability.

public UIMenu() => MenuRows = new List<string>();


While it compiles and does what you want it to, I would suggest not using => for constructor bodies. => is used for returned values, and the only real reason the compiler allows the above is because a command doesn't technically return a value.

It works, but it ain't pretty, and I'd flag it in a code review. Stick with method bodies for a constructor and leave => for one-liner methods with a trivially returned value.

private string _FillRow(string row, int limitLength)



The _underscore naming convention applies to private fields, but not private methods. Personally, I don't even like it for private fields and prefer to omit the leading underscore, but that's a different discussion for a different day.

Secondly, method names should be imperative (do this, get that, ...), not nouns or noun phrases. LoadProperties is more idiomatic.

var values = new Stack<string>();


ref has its uses, but in this case it's not really needed. Because you are refing a newly created object, you can just do:

var values = LoadProperties();


StringMeter is obsolete since the advent of LINQ.

IEnumerable<string> myStrings = ...;

int shortest = myStrings.Min(s => s.Length);
int longest = myStrings.Max(s => s.Length);


Additionally, it's unclear to me why you decided to work with double, as string lengths are always integers.

• * _underscore ... personally, I don't even like it for private fields* Ditto x 1024 ! Oct 7 at 18:14