# LeetCode 809: Expressive Words

I'm posting my C++ code for LeetCode's Expressive Words. If you have time and would like to review, please do so. Thank you!

Sometimes people repeat letters to represent extra feeling, such as "hello" -> "heeellooo", "hi" -> "hiiii". In these strings like "heeellooo", we have groups of adjacent letters that are all the same: "h", "eee", "ll", "ooo".

For some given string S, a query word is stretchy if it can be made to be equal to S by any number of applications of the following extension operation: choose a group consisting of characters c, and add some number of characters c to the group so that the size of the group is 3 or more.

For example, starting with "hello", we could do an extension on the group "o" to get "hellooo", but we cannot get "helloo" since the group "oo" has size less than 3. Also, we could do another extension like "ll" -> "lllll" to get "helllllooo". If S = "helllllooo", then the query word "hello" would be stretchy because of these two extension operations: query = "hello" -> "hellooo" -> "helllllooo" = S.

Given a list of query words, return the number of words that are stretchy.

Example: Input: S = "heeellooo" words = ["hello", "hi", "helo"]
Output: 1 Explanation: We can extend "e" and "o" in the word "hello"
to get "heeellooo". We can't extend "helo" to get "heeellooo" because the group "ll" is not size 3 or more.

Notes:

0 <= len(S) <= 100.
0 <= len(words) <= 100.
0 <= len(words[i]) <= 100. S and all words in words consist only of lowercase letters

### Accepted C++

class Solution {
public:
int expressiveWords(std::string base_string, std::vector<string> &words) {
int count = 0;

for (auto &word : words)
if (is_stretchable(base_string, word))
count++;

return count;
}

protected:
bool is_stretchable(std::string base_string, std::string words) { // 4 pointers
int base_length = base_string.size();
int words_length = words.size();
int left_a = 0, right_a = 0;

for (int left_b  = 0, right_b = 0; left_a < base_length && right_a < words_length; left_a = left_b, right_a = right_b) {
if (base_string[left_a] != words[right_a])
return false;

while (left_b < base_length && base_string[left_b] == base_string[left_a])
left_b++;

while (right_b < words_length && words[right_b] == words[right_a])
right_b++;

if (left_b - left_a != right_b - right_a && left_b - left_a < std::max(3, right_b - right_a))
return false;
}

return left_a == base_length && right_a == words_length;
}
};


### Reference

On LeetCode, there is an instance usually named Solution with one or more public functions which we are not allowed to rename those.

Pass by const reference to prevent copying and modification:

int expressiveWords(std::string const& base_string, std::vector<string> const& words)
^^^^^^                                  ^^^^^^

bool is_stretchable(std::string const& base_string, std::string const& words)
^^^^^^                          ^^^^^^

for (auto const& word : words)
^^^^^^


This prevents the strings being copied into the function. It will also catch situations were you accidentally try and modify the string.

Please add braces {} around sub blocks.
It will save you one day without you even knowing. Issues caused by missing braces are notoriously hard to find because they are caused when sombody else does something nasty that affects your code (multi line macros come to mind).

One variable per line:

   int left_a = 0, right_a = 0;


Its not going to hurt you to add an extra line and it makes the job easier for the next person.

Not sure it is worth it.
But just to be complete you could use a standard algorithm to count.

    int count = 0;

for (auto &word : words)
if (is_stretchable(base_string, word))
count++;

return count;

// ---

return std::count(std::begin(words), std::end(words),
[&base_string, this](auto const& word){return is_stretchable(base_string, word);});

• Is it still true that "issues caused by missing braces are notoriously hard to find", now that GCC has -Wmisleading-indentation? Commented Jun 18, 2020 at 20:05
• @RolandIllig: warning: unknown warning option '-Wmisleading-indentation'; did you mean '-Wbinding-in-condition'? Commented Jun 18, 2020 at 20:31
• Are you saying that pass by reference without the const does copy? Commented Jun 20, 2020 at 19:01