1
\$\begingroup\$

I've wrote a C++ program to calculate the determinant of a matrix:

#include <iostream> 
#include <string>

double getDeterminant(double arr[], int dimension);

int main() { 


    //First, the user has to enter the dimension of the matrix
    int dimension;
    std::cout << "Please enter dimension of Matrix: ";
    std::cin >> dimension;
    std::cout << std::endl;
    double matrix[dimension][dimension];

    //Now, the user has to enter the matrix line by line, seperated by commas
    std::string str;
    for(int i = 1; i <= dimension; i++) {
        std::cout << "Enter line " << i << " only seperated by commas: ";
        std::cin >> str;
        std::cout << std::endl;
        str = str + ',';
        std::string number;
        int count = 0;
        for(int k = 0; k < str.length(); k++) {
            if(str[k] != ',') {
                number = number + str[k];
            }
            else {
                matrix[i - 1][count] = std::stod(number);
                number = "";
                count++;
            }
        }
    }

    //Conversion to a onedimensional matrix to be able to give it over as a parameter
    double array[dimension * dimension];
    int k = 0;
    for(int i = 0; i < dimension; i++) {
        for(int j = 0; j < dimension; j++) {
            array[k] = matrix[i][j];
            k++;
        }
    }

    //Output
    for(int i = 0; i < dimension; i++) {
        for(int j = 0; j < dimension; j++) {
            std::cout << matrix[i][j] << " ";
        }
        std::cout << std::endl;
    }

    std::cout << "Determinant of the matrix is : " << getDeterminant(array, dimension) << std::endl; 
    return 0;
} 

double getDeterminant(double array[], int dimension) {

    //Formula for 2x2-matrix
    if(dimension == 2) {
        return array[0] * array[3] - array[1] * array[2];
    }

    //Conversion back to 2D-array
    double matrix[dimension][dimension];
    int k = 0;
    for(int i = 0; i < dimension; i++) {
        for(int j = 0; j < dimension; j++) {
            matrix[i][j] = array[k];
            k++;
        }
    }

    double result = 0;
    int sign = 1;
    for(int i = 0; i < dimension; i++) {

        //Submatrix
        double subMatrix[dimension - 1][dimension -1];
        for(int m = 1; m < dimension; m++) {
            int z = 0;
            for(int n = 0; n < dimension; n++) {
                if(n != i) {
                    subMatrix[m-1][z] = matrix[m][n];
                    z++;
                }
            }
        }

        //Conversion of the submatrix to 1D-array
        double array2[(dimension - 1) * (dimension - 1)];
        int k = 0;
        for(int x = 0; x < dimension - 1; x++) {
            for(int y = 0; y < dimension - 1; y++) {
                array2[k] = subMatrix[x][y];
                k++;
            }
        }

        //recursive call
        result = result + sign * matrix[0][i] * getDeterminant(array2, dimension -1);
        sign = -sign;
    }

    return result;
}

I would appreciate any suggestions on improving the code!


You can find the follow-up question here.

\$\endgroup\$

1 Answer 1

1
\$\begingroup\$
double matrix[dimension][dimension];
double array[dimension * dimension];
double matrix[dimension][dimension];
    double subMatrix[dimension - 1][dimension -1];
    double array2[(dimension - 1) * (dimension - 1)];

None of those are legal C++, because dimension isn't a constant-expression.


We have a signed/unsigned comparison here:

    for(int k = 0; k < str.length(); k++) {

We can easily eliminate the compiler warning by using a more appropriate type:

    for (std::size_t k = 0;  k < str.length();  ++k) {

But a better fix, given we only use k to index str, is to use a range-based loop:

    for (auto const c: str) {

When using operator>> on a stream, we must always check that it succeeded, before we depend on the result:

std::size_t dimension;
std::cin >> dimension;
if (!std::cin) {
    std::cerr << "Input failed\n";
    return EXIT_FAILURE;   // needs <cstdlib>
}
if (dimension == 0) {
    std::cout << "1\n";    // empty matrix determinant
}
\$\endgroup\$
6
  • \$\begingroup\$ Should I use vectors instead? \$\endgroup\$
    – user214772
    Commented Feb 10, 2020 at 10:15
  • \$\begingroup\$ That would be a good choice, as that handles memory management etc. Do note that vector-of-vector doesn't have the good locality properties of array-of-array, so consider using or making a matrix class that's more efficient. You could use OpenCV cv::Mat, or look at the Matrix class I recently reviewed. \$\endgroup\$ Commented Feb 10, 2020 at 10:26
  • \$\begingroup\$ I would use const auto& in the range-for loop, not that the type of a string will ever change. \$\endgroup\$
    – S.S. Anne
    Commented Feb 10, 2020 at 12:20
  • \$\begingroup\$ “empty matrix has zero determinant” – Actually not: codereview.stackexchange.com/a/236988/35991 :) \$\endgroup\$
    – Martin R
    Commented Feb 10, 2020 at 12:53
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @S.S.Anne, that might make sense (I'm guessing that most compilers are smart enough to copy characters rather than blindly using references as coded). \$\endgroup\$ Commented Feb 10, 2020 at 13:23

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.