I'm new to C#, I programmed a little in Java in the past. I had the two previous exercises reviewed here (permCheck, cyclicRotation, with a 100% score, just like this one), and I'm applying what the accepted answers contributed to me.
Even though the site expects names like public int solution(int X, int[] A)
, I refactored the code after it was accepted, and applied those contributions I mentioned.
Is this how professional code should look like in terms of quality, or are there still things to improve in solutions of easy exercises like this written by me?
Task description
A small frog wants to get to the other side of a river. The frog is initially located on one bank of the river (position 0) and wants to get to the opposite bank (position X+1). Leaves fall from a tree onto the surface of the river.
You are given an array A consisting of N integers representing the falling leaves. A[K] represents the position where one leaf falls at time K, measured in seconds.
The goal is to find the earliest time when the frog can jump to the other side of the river. The frog can cross only when leaves appear at every position across the river from 1 to X (that is, we want to find the earliest moment when all the positions from 1 to X are covered by leaves). You may assume that the speed of the current in the river is negligibly small, i.e. the leaves do not change their positions once they fall in the river.
For example, you are given integer X = 5 and array A such that:
A[0] = 1
A[1] = 3
A[2] = 1
A[3] = 4
A[4] = 2
A[5] = 3
A[6] = 5
A[7] = 4
In second 6, a leaf falls into position 5. This is the earliest time when leaves appear in every position across the river.Write a function:
class Solution { public int solution(int X, int[] A); }
that, given a non-empty array A consisting of N integers and integer X, returns the earliest time when the frog can jump to the other side of the river.
If the frog is never able to jump to the other side of the river, the function should return −1.
For example, given X = 5 and array A such that:
A[0] = 1
A[1] = 3
A[2] = 1
A[3] = 4
A[4] = 2
A[5] = 3
A[6] = 5
A[7] = 4
the function should return 6, as explained above.Write an efficient algorithm for the following assumptions:
N and X are integers within the range [1..100,000]; each element of array A is an integer within the range [1..X].
/// <summary>
/// Check if a given array contains the integers 1..N
/// </summary>
/// <returns>
/// -1 if <paramref name="fallenLeaves"/> does not contain all integers
/// 1..N, where N = <paramref name="requiredAmountOfLeaves"/>
/// a possitive int i, if the required amount of ints were present at
/// <paramref name="fallenLeaves"/>
/// </returns>
const int FROG_CANT_JUMP_TO_THE_OTHER_SIDE = -1;
public static int GetSecondsRequired
(int requiredAmountOfLeaves, int[] fallenLeaves)
{
bool[] leavesAsSteps = new bool[requiredAmountOfLeaves + 1];
int espectedSum = 0, correctSum = 0;
for (int i = 1; i <= fallenLeaves.Length; i++)
{
if (i <= requiredAmountOfLeaves)
//get summatory of 1..N
correctSum += i;
if (fallenLeaves[i - 1] <= requiredAmountOfLeaves &&
!leavesAsSteps[fallenLeaves[i - 1]])
{
//accumulate where the expected leaf fell and set its location to true
espectedSum += fallenLeaves[i - 1];
leavesAsSteps[fallenLeaves[i - 1]] = true;
}
if (espectedSum == correctSum && i >= requiredAmountOfLeaves)
//if all the espected leaves fell, then return the array's
//index where the last expected leaf was found
return i - 1;
}
return FROG_CANT_JUMP_TO_THE_OTHER_SIDE;
}