# Coding Challenge: Kattis

Short problem description:

A sequence of numbers are antiarithemtic if there exists no three numbers a_i, a_j, a_k – where a_i preceeds a_j which then again preceeds a_k in the sequence – such that a_i - a_j = a_j - a_k. Example: (5, 0, -1, 3, 1) is not antiarithemtic, because 5-3 = 3-1, wheras the sequence (1, 5, 3, 0, -1) is antiarithemtic.

My attempt:

import sys

lines = [x[:-1] for x in lines]
for line in lines:
if len(line) > 1:
line = line.split(':')
found = False
visited = {}
curr = line.split()
r = len(curr)
for i in range(r):
visited_2 = {}
if curr[i] in visited:
continue
else:
visited[curr[i]] = True
for j in range(i+1, r):
if curr[j] in visited_2:
continue
else:
visited_2[curr[j]] = True
tmp = int(curr[i]) - int(curr[j])
for k in range(j+1, r):
if int(curr[j]) - int(curr[k]) == tmp:
print("no")
found = True
break
print("yes")
else:
break


I believe my attempt solves the problem of finding out whether a sequence is antiarithmetic or not, as I've made my own extensive example-set to test that. My optimizing step so far has been to include dictionaries of visited "nodes" so as to not repeat searches for numbers that we already know do not result in an arithmetic sequence. However, it is not fast enough for Kattis, so I would much appreciate any suggestions on how to improve this.

• unwarranted indentation using an else: after a "disruptive if" (transferring execution with return, break, continue)
(Here, you are using this with otherwise empty "if-parts":
you could negate the conditions and just use the former else:-statements. Hello again, indentation.)
• (I belatedly noticed one more incidence of avoidable indentation right in the outer loop: you could use if len(line) <= 0: break;) If you are going to change the code more than a trifle/in any aspect mentioned by answers, ask a new question and cross-link unless you delete this one altogether. – greybeard Jul 20 '19 at 17:54