I have one function attrmapper. The purpose for this function is to build a dictionary, information, as attribution for the object. Is there a better way for me to rewrite the obj.information.update( part? The part to update information attribution will be more clear? Because if we replace mapping to a long string, the function will be really hard to read.

mapping = {
'firstname': 'this is fisrt name: {} should be string',
'lastname': 'this is last name: {} should be string',
'address': 'this is address {} should be address1, address2, state, state and zipcode',
'phone_number': 'this is phone number {} should be 0 to 9',
'gender': 'this is gender {}: should be male or female',
'company': 'this is company {} should be start with G',
'position': 'this is position {} should be engineer, manager and level',
'aAbreu': 'Albert Abreu',
'cGreen': 'Chad Green',
'lCessa': 'Luis Cessa',
'aJudge': 'Aaron Judge',
'jEllsbury': 'Jacoby Ellsbury',
def attrmapper(obj: object) -> object:
    information = {}
    for name in ['aAbreu', 'cGreen', 'lCessa', 'aJudge', 'jEllsbury']:
            {'{}_firstname'.format(name): mapping.get('firstname').format(mapping.get(name)),
            '{}_lastname'.format(name): mapping.get('lastname').format(mapping.get(name)),
            '{}_address'.format(name): mapping.get('address').format(mapping.get(name)),
            '{}_phone_number'.format(name): mapping.get('phone_number').format(mapping.get(name)),
            '{}_company'.format(name): mapping.get('company').format(mapping.get(name)),
            '{}_position'.format(name): mapping.get('firstname').format(mapping.get(name))})
    return obj

We can do a dictionary comprehension and avoid code repetition:

NAMES = ['aAbreu', 'cGreen', 'lCessa', 'aJudge', 'jEllsbury']
ATTRIBUTES = ['firstname', 'lastname', 'address', 'phone_number', 'company', 'position']
for name in NAMES:
    full_name = mapping.get(name)
        f'{name}_{attr}': mapping.get(attr).format(full_name)
        for attr in ATTRIBUTES

Note the use of an f-string for the key definition.

And, aside from that, I think you can remove the information variable as it is unused.

And, both my and your versions of the code don't handle missing keys situation - what if there is no such key in mapping?

  • \$\begingroup\$ thank you. yes, update the code for copy and paste error and if missing key, my function cannt even run at all i assume \$\endgroup\$ Dec 3 '17 at 15:33
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @SimonForsberg I was operating under the assumption that there was a copy-paste error in the question and as we figured out, there was one. In other words, I think the answer now "matches" the question fine. Thanks! \$\endgroup\$
    – alecxe
    Dec 3 '17 at 17:04
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ If only somebody had told me about the power of f-string years ago. I used to pull some stunts to get the same thing done. Bloody genius, good answer. \$\endgroup\$
    – Mast
    Dec 3 '17 at 20:25
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ well, f-strings are pretty new, so it wouldn't have been great advice more than a year or two ago. \$\endgroup\$ Dec 18 '17 at 4:27
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @OscarSmith yeah, but their awesomeness level is close to maximum :) \$\endgroup\$
    – alecxe
    Dec 18 '17 at 4:28

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service, privacy policy and cookie policy

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.