4
\$\begingroup\$

Two binary trees are considered equal if they are structurally identical and the nodes have the same value.

Tree is defined as :

    /**
 * Definition for a binary tree node.
 * public class TreeNode {
 * int val;
 * TreeNode left;
 * TreeNode right;
 * TreeNode(int x) { val = x; }
 * }
 */

And my solution is

public boolean isSameTree(TreeNode p, TreeNode q) {

    if(null == p && null == q){
        return true;
    }

    if((null == p && null != q) || (null == q && null != p)){
        return false;
    }

    if(p.val == q.val){
       return isSameTree(p.left,q.left) ? isSameTree(p.right,q.right) :false;
    } else {
        return false;
    }

}

Please suggest any improvements.

\$\endgroup\$

1 Answer 1

4
\$\begingroup\$

Your code already does its job well. It can be shortened a bit:

public boolean isSameTree(TreeNode p, TreeNode q) {
    if (p == null || q == null) {
        return p == q;
    }

    return p.val == q.val
        && isSameTree(p.left, q.left)
        && isSameTree(p.right, q.right);
}

I flipped the operands of the == operators since having null in the right hand side reads more naturally.

I added spaces after the if and after the commas to follow the common formatting style.

\$\endgroup\$
2
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ p == null && q == null can even be shorted to p == q in this case. \$\endgroup\$
    – RoToRa
    Oct 30, 2017 at 8:22
  • 1
    \$\begingroup\$ @RolandIllig shorter code is not always better. I could not immediately determine why the p==q is correct here. So I would either comment it in, or be more verbose. btw I do really like the && in the return statement. \$\endgroup\$ Oct 30, 2017 at 14:20

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.