1
\$\begingroup\$

I'm trying to parse addresses out of blocks of text, and have the following expression to do so:

/\d+\s(?:[sewnSEWN]\.?\s)?[\d\w]+\s(?:(?:[\d\w]+\s){0,3})?\w+\.?/

It will currently parse addresses such as:

300 E. Randolph St. Chicago, IL >> Returns 300 E. Randolph St.

5553 Bay Shore Drive >> Returns input

23 Joseph E Lowery Boulevard >> Returns input

513 Martin Luther King Jr Boulevard >> Returns input

This is exactly what I want. I was wondering, as this is the first expression I have ever written, if there was a way to shorten down the expression or refine it a little?

\$\endgroup\$

1 Answer 1

2
\$\begingroup\$

I don't know which implementation you are using, so translate this to relevant language when needed.

\w = [a-zA-Z0-9] so [\d\w] is same as [\w]

Note that (?(?:[\w]+\s){0,3})? is same as (?:[\w]+\s){0,3} because the expression inside is matched zero or more times.

You can also add in the \w+\s at the beginning to the above expression, and make it repeat from 1 to 4.

Here is a matching for your example, Knowing not much about your format, here is what I find odd.

/
  \d+                     # 513
  \s
  (?:[sewnSEWN]\.?\s)?    #
  (?:\w+\s){1,4}          # Martin Luther King Jr  
  \w+                     # Boulevard
  \.?
/
  • The spaces are restricted to a single space \s is this that strict? Perhaps you want \s+
  • If I understand you right, the portion after NSEW. directions are that there has to be atleast two words, and atmost 5 words separated by spaces. is this a correct interpretation?
\$\endgroup\$
4
  • \$\begingroup\$ I have it as single spaces because I assumed that's how standard addresses are broken up. The way I was trying to do it, the street name could contain at least one part (such as Randalph), and at most 4 different parts, and after the street name there would be the descripter, i.e. street, park, drive, etc. But they can be abbreviated, which is why I searched for the period after. \$\endgroup\$
    – ayyp
    Jun 13, 2012 at 18:45
  • \$\begingroup\$ @AndrewPeacock makes sense. If you are trying to match generic street names, what about the directions like NW, SE etc? \$\endgroup\$ Jun 13, 2012 at 18:49
  • \$\begingroup\$ I hadn't thought about that... Also, when I change (?:(?:[\w]+\s){0,3})? to (?:[\w]+\s){0,3}?, the second doesn't return the same result as the first. \$\endgroup\$
    – ayyp
    Jun 13, 2012 at 18:51
  • \$\begingroup\$ @AndrewPeacock remove the ? in your second expression. \$\endgroup\$ Jun 13, 2012 at 18:54

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge that you have read and understand our privacy policy and code of conduct.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.