Parallelization is not necessarily implemented nicely in R. However, it is far more ideal to use R's batch process than opening 10x Rstudio sessions as you saw (less of a resource drain per task).
Cores, cores, where art thou?
The first thing I would do is find out how many cores you have access to. Within this script 4 seem to be allocated. It is very important that you have at most or less than the total number of cores on your system for the parallel jobs to be appropriately scheduled.
# Find out how many cores exist
parallel::detectCores()
Speed
Speed-wise, I find the foreach
iterator to consume more time than I really care for. The reason is because it has a lot of unnecessary overhead and combine operations that tend to dynamically grow objects. So, I normally just interface directly with R's parallel
package's parLapply
function.
Code
I realize that this is just a condensed example, however, without seeing everything, we really cannot give super specific feedback.
With that being said, you will probably end up with an error running this code since i
is not defined within check()
. Only x
is in the function's scope.
Try to return some value to the foreach
loop, e.g. an i
value from check or a "pass-i"
, "fail-i"
to figure out if a process fails.
Another bit to note is that the script is currently set to output to the input directory. Try to create dedicate directories for input and output. The reason for this is, if you were to re-run your script, the processed files would be included within the next run. (Unless the pattern specified by list.files
is more specific to file nomenclature that you have.)
Also, since it seems like you are using spatial data. Is this a raster image that is contained within .rds? If so, could you get away with using a stack instead of the whole raster into memory?
Aside
If you are interested in learning more about how to parallelize with R, I would recommend looking over this slide deck (Disclaimer: I wrote it)
Edit
Per the submitter's comment that using lapply
is not possible. Please note that a for loop in R is the same in this case as using an lapply
. There are some benefits (speed being one) that make lapply
typically better than using a for
loop. Furthermore, the foreach
here is really a cast over the parXapply
statements.
library(parallel)
cl <- makeCluster(detectCores())
# Function
check <- function(x){
df <- readRDS(paste0("./", x))
df$var <- df$var*2
saveRDS(df, paste0("./temp/", x))
}
# Directory where *.rds files are
files <- list.files("./")
# Obtain unique files
i = unique(files)
# lapply statement
lapply(i, FUN=check)
# parlapply
parLapply(cl, X=i, fun=check)
Edit 2
This edit is meant to show how to export functions or variables per submitter's issue. Since the submitter has not made available the functions or variables needed within the parallelization this is a generic example.
library(parallel)
cl <- makeCluster(detectCores())
# Load packages on cluster's R sessions
clusterEvalQ(cl, library(pkgname))
# Export functions or variables to cluster's R session
func <- function(a){
out <- a*a
return(out)
}
v = 1:10
clusterExport(cl,c("func","v"))
stopCluster(cl)
make
(parallel option!) heavy workflow with lots of small R instances in parallel - you definitely don't need a full RStudio for each process. \$\endgroup\$i
was a type; I've fixed it. And yes, I have saved to a temp directory, but I left it out here. Can you define a make ? Not sure what youmean by this. \$\endgroup\$