I need to generate column a_b
based on column a
and column b
of df
, if both a
and b
are greater than 0, a_b
is assigned a value of 1, if both a
and b
are less than 0, a_b
is assigned a value of -1, I am using double np.where
.
My code is as follows, where generate_data
generates demo data
and get_result
is used for production
, where get_result
needs to be run 4 million times:
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
rand = np.random.default_rng(seed=0)
pd.set_option('display.max_columns', None)
def generate_data() -> pd.DataFrame:
_df = pd.DataFrame(rand.uniform(-1, 1, 70).reshape(10, 7), columns=['a', 'b1', 'b2', 'b3', 'b4', 'b5', 'b6'])
return _df
def get_result(_df: pd.DataFrame) -> pd.DataFrame:
a = _df.a.to_numpy()
for col in ['b1', 'b2', 'b3', 'b4', 'b5', 'b6']:
b = _df[col].to_numpy()
_df[f'a_{col}'] = np.where(
(a > 0) & (b > 0), 1., np.where(
(a < 0) & (b < 0), -1., 0.)
)
return _df
def main():
df = generate_data()
print(df)
df = get_result(df)
print(df)
if __name__ == '__main__':
main()
Data generated by generate_data:
a b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 b6
0 0.273923 -0.460427 -0.918053 -0.966945 0.626540 0.825511 0.213272
1 0.458993 0.087250 0.870145 0.631707 -0.994523 0.714809 -0.932829
2 0.459311 -0.648689 0.726358 0.082922 -0.400576 -0.154626 -0.943361
3 -0.751433 0.341249 0.294379 0.230770 -0.232645 0.994420 0.961671
4 0.371084 0.300919 0.376893 -0.222157 -0.729807 0.442977 0.050709
5 -0.379516 -0.028329 0.778976 0.868087 -0.284410 0.143060 -0.356261
6 0.188600 -0.324178 -0.216762 0.780549 -0.545685 0.246374 -0.831969
7 0.665288 0.574197 -0.521261 0.752968 -0.882864 -0.327766 -0.699441
8 -0.099321 0.592649 -0.538716 -0.895957 -0.190896 -0.602974 -0.818494
9 0.160665 -0.402608 0.343990 -0.600969 0.884226 -0.269780 -0.789009
My desired result:
a b1 b2 b3 b4 b5 b6 a_b1 \
0 0.273923 -0.460427 -0.918053 -0.966945 0.626540 0.825511 0.213272 0.0
1 0.458993 0.087250 0.870145 0.631707 -0.994523 0.714809 -0.932829 1.0
2 0.459311 -0.648689 0.726358 0.082922 -0.400576 -0.154626 -0.943361 0.0
3 -0.751433 0.341249 0.294379 0.230770 -0.232645 0.994420 0.961671 0.0
4 0.371084 0.300919 0.376893 -0.222157 -0.729807 0.442977 0.050709 1.0
5 -0.379516 -0.028329 0.778976 0.868087 -0.284410 0.143060 -0.356261 -1.0
6 0.188600 -0.324178 -0.216762 0.780549 -0.545685 0.246374 -0.831969 0.0
7 0.665288 0.574197 -0.521261 0.752968 -0.882864 -0.327766 -0.699441 1.0
8 -0.099321 0.592649 -0.538716 -0.895957 -0.190896 -0.602974 -0.818494 0.0
9 0.160665 -0.402608 0.343990 -0.600969 0.884226 -0.269780 -0.789009 0.0
a_b2 a_b3 a_b4 a_b5 a_b6
0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0 1.0
1 1.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0
2 1.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
3 0.0 0.0 -1.0 0.0 0.0
4 1.0 0.0 0.0 1.0 1.0
5 0.0 0.0 -1.0 0.0 -1.0
6 0.0 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0
7 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0 0.0
8 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0 -1.0
9 1.0 0.0 1.0 0.0 0.0
Performance evaluation:
%timeit get_result(df)
1.56 ms ± 54.7 µs per loop (mean ± std. dev. of 7 runs, 1000 loops each)
How can it be faster?
generated_data
, just the column names are different. \$\endgroup\$self.status
generated there, and the final result isobservastion
, and the type islist
. codereview.stackexchange.com/questions/277147 \$\endgroup\$