How bad is this jQuery? [closed]

Question

$($(this).parent().parent().parent().parent().parent().parent().children()[0]).html()

Answer 1

.parent().parent().parent().parent().parent().parent()

This can be much simplified by using parents() which returns an array, which you can just access with an index. I.e. you can replace the above with:

.parents()[5]

The upsides of this, besides being more concise, are that it the reader of your code can see which parent you're accessing without having to count the calls to parent and that if you ever need to access a different parent, you can just change the number instead of having to add or remove calls to parent.

Answer 2

This...is pretty bad. But there's no real way to tell how bad it has to be given other constraints. For instance, if this is a JS file meant to affect a page whose HTML you don't have control over, then you can't do much better than something like

$(this).parents(":eq(5)").children(":eq(0)").html()

If this is an element you have to access a lot, consider adding an id or class to it, then selecting by that.

$("#fifth-parent-first-child").html() //or something descriptive

Again, if you don't have access to the HTML, you'll need to add it yourself at runtime

$(document).ready(
     function () {
         $(foo).parents(":eq(5)").children(":eq(0)").addClass("something-descriptive")
     }
);
$(".something-descriptive").html()

Consider pasting some surrounding code for more insight.

Answer 3

Besides what sepp2k said:

Instead of accessing the DOM object of the first child and then rewrapping it in a jQuery object, you can use the method .eq() to access it directly.

So instead of this:

$($(this)/* ... */.children()[0]).html()

Use this:

$(this)/* ... */.children().eq(0).html()

And there are possibly more ways to optimize it, if you show the HTML it's operating on.

Answer 4

1. Instead of doing so many .parent() calls, you can use .parents():

$(this).parents(':eq(5)');

2. You can use .eq() to get the n^th occurrence of an element, you don't need to do [0] and pass it to jQuery again.

$($(this).parents(':eq(5)').children()[0]).html()

This is better:

$(this).parents(':eq(5)').children().eq(0).html();

Though jQuery has a :first-child selector, which is more understandable:

$(this).parents(':eq(5)').find(':first-child').html();

Reference

• .parents()
• .eq()
• :first-child selector

Answer 5

Assuming you don't have access to the html (where you could assign an id the child), the only real option you have is:

$(this).parents().eq(5).children().eq(0).html();

if you are going to be accessing the element more than once you could assign it on load:

$(document).ready(function(){
     window.foo = $(bar).parents().eq(5).children().eq(0);
});
...
foo.html();

knowing more about why you need to do dom traversing, may yield further advice.