Timeline for Loading a Model from a Database
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jun 6, 2015 at 11:42 | vote | accept | JammoD | ||
Jun 6, 2015 at 11:29 | answer | added | RubberDuck | timeline score: 2 | |
Jun 6, 2015 at 10:41 | comment | added | JammoD | @RubberDuck I've asked that question many times and argued the point that it would be much better to separate it. Thanks for your assistance either way :) | |
Jun 6, 2015 at 10:30 | history | edited | JammoD | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 4 characters in body
|
Jun 6, 2015 at 10:18 | comment | added | RubberDuck | Data overload. They might think that's what they want, but has anybody asked if it would be better to show separate screens? In my experience, this is too much for a human brain to cope with (user or developer). If that's the requirement though, ok then. I get it. Business loves their spreadsheets. | |
Jun 6, 2015 at 10:11 | comment | added | JammoD | @RubberDuck Would that not be overkill if each CaseID can only have one set of information? As each case is a property and that property can only have one set of details. The business requirement for all the data is to be loaded into a screen to allow the staff to update and view the information for the property. | |
Jun 6, 2015 at 10:07 | comment | added | RubberDuck | Let me ask you something, what exactly do you plan on doing with all that data at once? | |
Jun 6, 2015 at 10:04 | comment | added | RubberDuck | Ahh. Well, I guess spreadsheet syndrome can manifest in different ways. I don't know how I would proceed because I have no idea what you're trying to do with the data. All I know is you're dealing with 13 distinct objects here and you've stuffed them into this one class. All I had to do was count the comments on the last snippet to tell that much. | |
Jun 6, 2015 at 9:56 | comment | added | JammoD | @RubberDuck I am intrigued how you can tell the database structure from that one model as I am not using Direct Table access with this method and have a stored procedure which is using many tables. I have then created a model based on that stored procedure. How would you proceed? | |
Jun 6, 2015 at 9:42 | comment | added | RubberDuck | It's not irrelevant at all. This looks horrible simply because your model is huge. I'm counting 13 distinct models shoved inside of that one you've got there. | |
Jun 6, 2015 at 7:32 | comment | added | JammoD | @RubberDuck I'm also the DBA, its a system that I have inherited and does requires some more normalisation but that's kind of irrelevant for this question as this is a Stored Procedure. | |
Jun 5, 2015 at 21:17 | comment | added | RubberDuck | Dude, you need to talk to your DBA about normalizing that table. | |
Jun 5, 2015 at 16:20 | history | edited | Malachi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed formatting and added a tag
|
Jun 5, 2015 at 16:15 | history | asked | JammoD | CC BY-SA 3.0 |