Timeline for Mockup in C of hardware implementation for multiplication of signed integers
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 20, 2015 at 2:24 | review | First posts | |||
| May 20, 2015 at 2:43 | |||||
| May 16, 2015 at 18:34 | comment | added | Sergio Formiggini | Ok! I've understand something about software, I apologize! ... I didn't think it was an hardware problem ... My solution doesn't use conditional jumps, but I understand your point of view! | |
| May 16, 2015 at 17:47 | comment | added | Patrick Roberts | My argument to avoid conditionals wasn't to necessarily optimize, but to make the task arithmatically translatable to hardware. Also, I thought the point of CR was to give a review of the OP's code without modifying the expected behavior, which you seem to have done with your answer. | |
| May 16, 2015 at 9:11 | history | edited | Sergio Formiggini | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 125 characters in body
|
| May 16, 2015 at 9:07 | comment | added | Sergio Formiggini | @Patrick Roberts. I would like your opinion! Remember that the assumption of sign is important with CPUs that doesn't use two's complement. | |
| May 16, 2015 at 8:59 | history | answered | Sergio Formiggini | CC BY-SA 3.0 |