Timeline for Linq me a FizzBuzz
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
6 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 14, 2015 at 16:45 | comment | added | Ben Aaronson | This seems to assume that the requirements you're given state the problem in the way that best describes its underlying structure. In real life that's often not the case, and discovering the structure is part of your job as a developer. | |
| Jan 13, 2015 at 14:57 | comment | added | RubberDuck | @RemcoGerlich you might find this humorous. | |
| Jan 13, 2015 at 14:55 | comment | added | RemcoGerlich | The "classic requirements" were a test if the interviewee could program at all. This is overthinking it by quite a bit. | |
| Jan 13, 2015 at 13:03 | comment | added | Simon Forsberg | If there are any holy wars in FizzBuzz, this would be it. | |
| Jan 13, 2015 at 13:01 | comment | added | user2858451 | I literally copy+pasted the requirement (offline test). I agree with your points though. | |
| Jan 13, 2015 at 12:56 | history | answered | RubberDuck | CC BY-SA 3.0 |