Skip to main content
edited tags
Link
Quill
  • 11.9k
  • 5
  • 40
  • 93
added 3 characters in body
Source Link
MLM
  • 173
  • 9
deleted 4 characters in body
Source Link
MLM
  • 173
  • 9

Along with the usual code review criteria(mainly clarity), I am wondering if I just reinvented the wheel or overthought the whole problem. The code does seem a bit long for the functionality and I am not keen how how it directly modifies the object(wish it would return a new object). This means that you have to clone the data before every use to keep all the references to the original data happy.

Along with the usual code review criteria(mainly clarity), I am wondering if I just reinvented the wheel or overthought the whole problem. The code does seem a bit long for the functionality and I am not keen how how it directly modifies the object(wish it would return a new object). This means that you have to clone the data before every use to keep all the references to the original data happy.

Along with the usual code review criteria(mainly clarity), I am wondering if I just reinvented the wheel or overthought the whole problem. The code does seem a bit long for the functionality and I am not keen how it directly modifies the object(wish it would return a new object). This means that you have to clone the data before every use to keep all the references to the original data happy.

added 1 character in body
Source Link
MLM
  • 173
  • 9
Loading
added 225 characters in body
Source Link
MLM
  • 173
  • 9
Loading
added 144 characters in body
Source Link
MLM
  • 173
  • 9
Loading
edited body
Source Link
MLM
  • 173
  • 9
Loading
Source Link
MLM
  • 173
  • 9
Loading