Timeline for Simple TCP Client Server application with receive side only
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Mar 21, 2021 at 8:54 | history | suggested | Glorfindel | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
broken link fixed
|
| Mar 21, 2021 at 6:47 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Mar 21, 2021 at 8:54 | |||||
| Nov 5, 2014 at 2:03 | history | edited | Sleiman Jneidi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 194 characters in body
|
| Nov 5, 2014 at 1:23 | comment | added | svick | I'm not disputing that, I just think that you should fix the incorrect statements in your answer. | |
| Nov 5, 2014 at 1:10 | comment | added | Sleiman Jneidi | I suggested him to delete all threads in general and use TPL instead because Thread.Sleep should never be used, Thread.Sleep(0) is the only acceptable one | |
| Nov 5, 2014 at 1:06 | comment | added | svick |
And Task.Delay(2000) is not a replacement for Thread.Sleep(2000), await Task.Delay(2000) is, which is a big difference.
|
|
| Nov 5, 2014 at 1:05 | comment | added | svick | Your own link says that this implementation ("second version" in the article) of singleton is thread-safe. Its only issue is that it can be slow. | |
| Nov 5, 2014 at 1:01 | history | edited | svick | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
list formatting; rm code formatting for non-code
|
| Nov 4, 2014 at 23:27 | history | edited | Sleiman Jneidi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 389 characters in body
|
| Nov 4, 2014 at 23:21 | history | edited | Sleiman Jneidi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 389 characters in body
|
| Nov 4, 2014 at 23:08 | history | edited | Sleiman Jneidi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 285 characters in body
|
| Nov 4, 2014 at 22:59 | history | edited | Sleiman Jneidi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 114 characters in body
|
| Nov 4, 2014 at 22:52 | history | answered | Sleiman Jneidi | CC BY-SA 3.0 |