Timeline for Date Time - Seconds Difference
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 4, 2018 at 9:08 | answer | added | Toby Speight | timeline score: 1 | |
| Dec 31, 2011 at 23:28 | vote | accept | hiddensunset4 | ||
| Nov 29, 2011 at 20:23 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackCodeReview/status/141613150331080706 | ||
| Nov 28, 2011 at 21:58 | comment | added | hiddensunset4 | @LokiAstari yes that function is correct, directly implemented from the Wikipedia page haha. As mentioned already however, accuracy is not the issue here. | |
| Nov 28, 2011 at 21:31 | comment | added | Loki Astari | I don't see why you are using gmtime_r() at the top. If you set the other fields to blank they will be set up correctly: struct tm t1 = {0}; Also the second way not only takes into account leap year but also leap seconds and any missed days that were removed from the calendar for that local (so it is doing significantly more work). | |
| Nov 28, 2011 at 21:17 | comment | added | Loki Astari |
Did you get is_leap_year() correct? Remember you need to check for 100 and 400 year boundaries.
|
|
| Nov 28, 2011 at 17:58 | answer | added | Jerry Coffin | timeline score: 5 | |
| Nov 28, 2011 at 16:27 | history | edited | hiddensunset4 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 11 characters in body
|
| Nov 28, 2011 at 16:19 | history | asked | hiddensunset4 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |