Timeline for PPL and AMP performing worse than sequential transform
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oct 16, 2014 at 16:28 | comment | added | AndersK | @Shatkal in release mode: Using device : NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN The time taken for the sequential function to execute was: 30ms The time taken for the AMP function to execute was: 109ms The AMP function generated the correct answer: true The time taken for the PPL function to execute was: 45ms The PPL function generated the correct answer: true | |
| Oct 16, 2014 at 16:26 | comment | added | AndersK | @Shaktal as a side note, when I ran your program in debug mode I got the following output: Using device : NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN The time taken for the sequential function to execute was: 704ms The time taken for the AMP function to execute was: 120ms The AMP function generated the correct answer: true The time taken for the PPL function to execute was: 142376ms The PPL function generated the correct answer: true | |
| Aug 3, 2014 at 17:14 | history | edited | Morwenn |
Edited tags.
|
|
| Jul 6, 2014 at 9:25 | vote | accept | Thomas Russell | ||
| Jul 5, 2014 at 19:02 | answer | added | Jerry Coffin | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jul 5, 2014 at 18:56 | history | edited | Jerry Coffin | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Corrected omission in code.
|
| Jul 5, 2014 at 17:18 | comment | added | Thomas Russell |
@Jamal Bad habits haha; I've changed it in the post to a const std::size_t now though.
|
|
| Jul 5, 2014 at 17:17 | history | edited | Thomas Russell | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 90 characters in body
|
| Jul 5, 2014 at 17:15 | history | edited | Jamal |
edited tags
|
|
| Jul 5, 2014 at 17:15 | comment | added | Jamal |
Why are you using a macro? Just do const int size = 30737418;.
|
|
| Jul 5, 2014 at 17:10 | history | asked | Thomas Russell | CC BY-SA 3.0 |