Timeline for Simple Hello World with unit tests
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mar 11, 2014 at 1:29 | vote | accept | user38409 | ||
| Mar 10, 2014 at 15:34 | vote | accept | user38409 | ||
| Mar 10, 2014 at 15:34 | |||||
| Mar 10, 2014 at 14:44 | comment | added | user38409 | Thanks for your comments. The intent of the example is to sort of bridge the typical "hello world" into a real world example. With that intent, I missed the mark. Comments are over done. Real world I wouldn't comment private methods or fields unless there was a need. I will corrected that. | |
| Mar 10, 2014 at 1:11 | history | edited | 200_success | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title and tags
|
| Mar 9, 2014 at 22:42 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackCodeReview/status/442792590208147457 | ||
| Mar 9, 2014 at 19:40 | answer | added | rolfl | timeline score: 8 | |
| Mar 9, 2014 at 18:17 | answer | added | Ben Aaronson | timeline score: 11 | |
| Mar 9, 2014 at 18:14 | answer | added | palacsint | timeline score: 12 | |
| Mar 9, 2014 at 17:36 | comment | added | Ben Aaronson | Personally I'd find this a little difficult to give much of a review on. My first reaction is that your tests a bit brittle because they depend on the exact format of the output, for example. But it's such a contrived, 'toy' application that I'd find it hard to say what good tests are. I'd suggest you build something a little larger and closer resembling a real application to get a good review. One thing I would say though is don't add pointless comments to methods. It's actually a violation of Don't Repeat Yourself. | |
| Mar 9, 2014 at 17:17 | review | First posts | |||
| Mar 9, 2014 at 18:41 | |||||
| Mar 9, 2014 at 16:58 | history | asked | user38409 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |