Skip to main content

Timeline for Spam validator - beta version

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

13 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Feb 19, 2014 at 13:33 comment added Dimag Kharab see here itself , stackexchange not able to stop the spam word "vi**gra"..atleast my system would have notified
Feb 19, 2014 at 13:30 comment added Dimag Kharab let us continue this discussion in chat
Feb 19, 2014 at 13:26 comment added Dimag Kharab and we can ban that ip when detected for spamming via ajax request , what you say is that a good idea ?
Feb 19, 2014 at 13:25 comment added Henrique Barcelos URL length checking is very uneffective, since it's easy to shorten it using bit.ly, goo.gl, etc. I will not insist anymore, but your approach is not effective for preventing human spammers.
Feb 19, 2014 at 13:22 comment added Dimag Kharab url length , content length and url words check are also other aspects whom you seems overlooking
Feb 19, 2014 at 13:21 comment added Dimag Kharab see viagra ViAgrA VIAGRA Viagra Viagra Viagr*a all test it detected , other than last two . The point is to have atleast some form of check on spammers
Feb 19, 2014 at 13:14 comment added Henrique Barcelos I disagree, see the edited answer.
Feb 19, 2014 at 13:14 history edited Henrique Barcelos CC BY-SA 3.0
added 573 characters in body
Feb 19, 2014 at 13:04 comment added Dimag Kharab anyways thanks @henrique for the comment/ suggestion . one thing I would like to point out is that we have a wide varity of option , which will ensure(may be not 100%) in stopping spams.
Feb 19, 2014 at 13:02 history edited Henrique Barcelos CC BY-SA 3.0
deleted 56 characters in body
Feb 19, 2014 at 13:01 comment added Henrique Barcelos That's true. Didn't noticed it. Edited.
Feb 19, 2014 at 12:59 comment added Dimag Kharab Yep agreed , as you can See I said "manual spamming" , for automated Bots we can use reCaptcha or so
Feb 19, 2014 at 12:57 history answered Henrique Barcelos CC BY-SA 3.0