Timeline for Extracting pattern and simplifying testing
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Dec 30, 2013 at 18:34 | vote | accept | abatishchev | ||
Dec 28, 2013 at 4:18 | vote | accept | abatishchev | ||
Dec 28, 2013 at 7:22 | |||||
Dec 27, 2013 at 20:23 | answer | added | Mark Brackett | timeline score: 1 | |
Dec 27, 2013 at 20:10 | comment | added | abuzittin gillifirca |
@abatishchev Do_Should_Pass_Result_Of_Build_To_Format : You clearly are testing the implementation details.
|
|
Dec 27, 2013 at 19:37 | history | edited | Jamal | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
Dec 27, 2013 at 19:35 | answer | added | Dan Lyons | timeline score: 2 | |
Dec 27, 2013 at 19:30 | comment | added | abatishchev | @abuzittingillifirca: the real code is very similar: 4 dependencies with almost same names call each other in same order. Or 3 of them, or 5. | |
Dec 27, 2013 at 19:28 | comment | added | abatishchev |
@GertArnold: I have different interfaces (about 5 now) with different implementation and number of dependencies but the patter is same: D(i) calls D(i+1) .
|
|
Dec 27, 2013 at 15:55 | comment | added | abuzittin gillifirca | Post some real code. | |
Dec 27, 2013 at 13:38 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackCodeReview/status/416563760175009792 | ||
Dec 27, 2013 at 11:20 | answer | added | svick | timeline score: 3 | |
Dec 27, 2013 at 10:57 | comment | added | Gert Arnold | Do you use many different implementations of these interfaces, or always the same? | |
Dec 27, 2013 at 8:29 | history | edited | abatishchev | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 characters in body
|
Dec 27, 2013 at 8:20 | history | asked | abatishchev | CC BY-SA 3.0 |