Timeline for Efficient FizzBuzz
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
21 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 3, 2015 at 12:34 | history | protected | 200_success | ||
| S Jun 3, 2015 at 11:24 | history | edited | Nick Udell |
Replace optimization tag with performance because optimization is in "the process of being eliminated". Added beginner tag.
|
|
| S Jun 3, 2015 at 11:24 | history | suggested | lightning_missile |
Replace optimization tag with performance because optimization is in "the process of being eliminated"
|
|
| Jun 3, 2015 at 10:46 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jun 3, 2015 at 11:24 | |||||
| Jan 30, 2014 at 20:01 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Jan 30, 2014 at 20:10 | |||||
| Dec 6, 2013 at 14:52 | comment | added | CodesInChaos |
The performance of FizzBuzz itself is almost certainly by System.out.println. It also has only 100 iterations, so JVM startup is more expensive than your code. Are you sue you want to increase efficiency? Unless you know (usually because your profiled it) that this code is too slow, I'd focus on readability over performance.
|
|
| Dec 6, 2013 at 13:38 | vote | accept | Pooja | ||
| Dec 6, 2013 at 13:37 | vote | accept | Pooja | ||
| Dec 6, 2013 at 13:38 | |||||
| Dec 6, 2013 at 13:32 | vote | accept | Pooja | ||
| Dec 6, 2013 at 13:37 | |||||
| Dec 5, 2013 at 22:35 | comment | added | Eric Lippert | Efficiency is defined as work performed per resource consumed. What work are you performing, and what resource do you care about? Until we know those things it is impossible to answer the question "how can we make it more efficient?" | |
| Dec 5, 2013 at 21:08 | answer | added | ChrisWue | timeline score: 3 | |
| Dec 5, 2013 at 20:30 | answer | added | NealB | timeline score: 2 | |
| Dec 5, 2013 at 19:22 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackCodeReview/status/408677748585291776 | ||
| Dec 5, 2013 at 18:45 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Dec 5, 2013 at 20:30 | |||||
| Dec 5, 2013 at 18:02 | comment | added | 200_success | Advice to reviewers: This being Code Review, answers of the form "This is how I would do it: code" are insufficient. Your answer must bear some relationship to the code in the original question. | |
| Dec 5, 2013 at 17:42 | answer | added | 200_success | timeline score: 15 | |
| Dec 5, 2013 at 17:40 | answer | added | Peter Lawrey | timeline score: 7 | |
| Dec 5, 2013 at 17:22 | answer | added | rolfl | timeline score: 11 | |
| Dec 5, 2013 at 17:14 | review | First posts | |||
| Dec 5, 2013 at 17:55 | |||||
| Dec 5, 2013 at 17:04 | history | edited | Jamal | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 21 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
|
| Dec 5, 2013 at 16:59 | history | asked | Pooja | CC BY-SA 3.0 |