Timeline for Comparison between two design battle approaches
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
28 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 10, 2020 at 13:24 | history | edited | CommunityBot |
Commonmark migration
|
|
| Oct 31, 2015 at 20:50 | history | edited | anon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
[Edit removed during grace period]
|
| Oct 31, 2015 at 19:40 | history | edited | Jamal | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 400 characters in body
|
| Oct 31, 2015 at 18:04 | history | edited | anon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 660 characters in body
|
| Oct 31, 2015 at 17:55 | history | edited | Jamal | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 723 characters in body; edited title; edited tags
|
| Oct 31, 2015 at 17:42 | history | edited | anon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 435 characters in body
|
| Dec 5, 2013 at 7:41 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Nov 26, 2013 at 17:53 | vote | accept | CommunityBot | ||
| Nov 26, 2013 at 17:56 | |||||
| Nov 26, 2013 at 17:52 | answer | added | anon | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 26, 2013 at 16:22 | vote | accept | vexe | ||
| Nov 26, 2013 at 17:53 | |||||
| Nov 25, 2013 at 20:22 | answer | added | John Deters | timeline score: 4 | |
| Nov 24, 2013 at 5:01 | vote | accept | vexe | ||
| Nov 24, 2013 at 5:01 | |||||
| Nov 23, 2013 at 20:32 | answer | added | sqykly | timeline score: 7 | |
| Nov 22, 2013 at 18:59 | review | Close votes | |||
| Nov 22, 2013 at 22:14 | |||||
| Nov 22, 2013 at 12:00 | comment | added | anon | Thanks for your comment. You are right. I think they both kinda meet the requirements (which is, providing an extensible way of adding/swapping items), that's why I wanted to look at other factors to help me determine which should I go for, since they both take me there. "the actual requirements are very unclear" hmm? I thought that was clear, unless you meant something else. You mean the requirements from these systems, or all my requirements in the whole inventory project? | |
| Nov 22, 2013 at 10:06 | comment | added | MattDavey | A system should be primarily evaluated on how well it meets the requirements, not how many ticks it gets on a list of design patterns/principles. In your question the actual requirements are very unclear, so it's very difficult for us to evaluate your code. It's clear there's a lot of complexity in your solution (both of them), but without the bigger picture we cannot determine whether this is intrinsic complexity or accidental complexity. | |
| Nov 22, 2013 at 4:35 | comment | added | anon | Thanks for that! - your statement inspired me a better solution - I came up with it while taking a bath - taking a bath is nice. | |
| Nov 22, 2013 at 4:28 | answer | added | anon | timeline score: 4 | |
| Nov 21, 2013 at 15:07 | comment | added | abuzittin gillifirca |
swapper.Swap<SnapSwap>(new SnapSwapArgs(1, 2, 3, etc)); That's a lot of repetition.
|
|
| Nov 21, 2013 at 13:02 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackCodeReview/status/403508594991443969 | ||
| Nov 21, 2013 at 12:24 | history | edited | anon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited body
|
| Nov 21, 2013 at 9:59 | comment | added | Chandranshu | Since you acknowledged that you are not sure about D, you should '?' in the comparison table. | |
| Nov 21, 2013 at 7:26 | history | edited | anon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 25 characters in body
|
| Nov 21, 2013 at 7:13 | history | edited | Jamal | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 319 characters in body
|
| Nov 21, 2013 at 7:03 | history | edited | anon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 11326 characters in body
|
| Nov 21, 2013 at 6:58 | history | edited | anon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 11326 characters in body
|
| Nov 21, 2013 at 6:56 | review | First posts | |||
| Nov 21, 2013 at 12:13 | |||||
| Nov 21, 2013 at 6:40 | history | asked | anon | CC BY-SA 3.0 |