Timeline for A simple String class and its special member functions
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
11 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Mar 14, 2023 at 2:44 | vote | accept | Lion Lai | ||
Mar 13, 2023 at 10:37 | history | edited | Toby Speight | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deprettify program output
|
Mar 13, 2023 at 2:06 | comment | added | Lion Lai | Thanks. I fixed the question to make it more complete. | |
Mar 13, 2023 at 2:04 | vote | accept | Lion Lai | ||
Mar 14, 2023 at 2:44 | |||||
Mar 13, 2023 at 1:57 | history | edited | Lion Lai | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 844 characters in body
|
Mar 11, 2023 at 15:29 | answer | added | Toby Speight | timeline score: 4 | |
Mar 11, 2023 at 11:02 | answer | added | G. Sliepen | timeline score: 4 | |
Mar 10, 2023 at 17:40 | review | Close votes | |||
Mar 12, 2023 at 14:34 | |||||
Mar 10, 2023 at 17:19 | comment | added | pacmaninbw♦ |
When you post a question on Code Review we want to see as much of it as possible, such as include files and any using statements. I suspect the code contains using namespace std; but I can't be sure and that is something I would want to comment on. It is actually best to provide the code as files so that we might be able to test it ourselves. Right now the code is very hard to review.
|
|
Mar 9, 2023 at 7:09 | comment | added | ALX23z | The specification for "moved-from" states is that they are valid, it is just that it is not specified what they ought to be - making it author's choice. They must be destructible and reassignable. But it might be illegal to call some of the regular functions of the moved-from object. | |
Mar 9, 2023 at 2:47 | history | asked | Lion Lai | CC BY-SA 4.0 |