Timeline for Query: user can see all posts by him and his friends
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
14 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 2, 2015 at 19:21 | history | edited | Jamal | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 2356 characters in body
|
May 2, 2015 at 19:18 | history | edited | Caridorc | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
meaningful title
|
Jun 4, 2013 at 9:12 | answer | added | Kickstart | timeline score: 1 | |
May 8, 2013 at 14:32 | vote | accept | Mercurial | ||
May 8, 2013 at 14:09 | history | edited | Mercurial | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added
|
May 8, 2013 at 13:30 | answer | added | GlenPeterson | timeline score: 3 | |
May 7, 2013 at 16:07 | comment | added | Mercurial | all the things you mentioned are well maintained in my database. I was worried about this long query. I thought this many operations and comparisions are slowing this down. Can you please take a look and confirm that it is well enough. | |
May 7, 2013 at 15:59 | comment | added | Quentin Pradet | Not really. Denormalization, indexes, foreign keys, this is what you need. It could make the query simpler but will make other code more complex (eg. code that writes into the database). | |
May 7, 2013 at 15:52 | comment | added | Mercurial | My ultimate goal is faster query. What i thought, lesser the number of operation/compare, lesser the time. | |
May 7, 2013 at 15:43 | comment | added | Quentin Pradet | Do you want the code to be shorter or the query to execute faster? | |
May 7, 2013 at 10:23 | history | edited | Mercurial | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Added some details.
|
May 7, 2013 at 8:22 | history | edited | Quentin Pradet | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
format query
|
May 7, 2013 at 6:24 | review | First posts | |||
May 7, 2013 at 7:00 | |||||
May 7, 2013 at 6:06 | history | asked | Mercurial | CC BY-SA 3.0 |