Timeline for Collect a list of unique "Origin" headers from a repeated URL request [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
21 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 4, 2020 at 12:46 | comment | added | Mast♦ | @Peilonrayz Considering more and more people are answering off-topic questions (which they shouldn't) and the mess it has created on this one, I'm in favour of putting the revised code in a new question this time. | |
| Apr 29, 2020 at 19:00 | comment | added | Peilonrayz♦ |
I'm sorry that your first experience is so poor Kate. Since this has now been closed please feel free to edit the post to become on-topic, as Reinderien has suggested. Additionally the more code you proved the better we can help you improve your code. However in the future please do not edit the code in the question to address answers, this is because it causes icky situations like this where you're stuck with for _ in(5). When you edit the question so that it includes a complete script please feel free to ping me to help kick start a potential reopen.
|
|
| Apr 29, 2020 at 18:27 | history | closed |
Reinderien Mast♦ Peilonrayz♦ Vogel612 |
Not suitable for this site | |
| Apr 29, 2020 at 17:15 | review | Close votes | |||
| Apr 29, 2020 at 18:30 | |||||
| Apr 29, 2020 at 16:47 | vote | accept | Kate Velasquez | ||
| Apr 29, 2020 at 16:26 | comment | added | Reinderien | @KateVelasquez In the meantime I think it is safe for you to post a new question with more code and context, after having read codereview.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/2436/… . I do not think it would be considered a duplicate. Thank you for your patience. | |
| Apr 29, 2020 at 16:17 | comment | added | Reinderien | codereview.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/10471/… | |
| Apr 29, 2020 at 16:11 | comment | added | Reinderien | That is a very good question. In theory, all of the code reviewers should have known that this is off-topic and should not have posted answers; this would have been voted-to-close, you would have improved it, and it would have then re-opened. In practice I'm going to ask on meta. | |
| Apr 29, 2020 at 16:04 | comment | added | Kate Velasquez | @Reinderien Also should I be editing my code in the question after I get feedback in the form of comments/answers? Because that's what I've been doing and that's why I go stuck with this stupid "for _ in(5)" which birthed a whole answer. | |
| Apr 29, 2020 at 16:01 | comment | added | Kate Velasquez | @Reinderien Yes, this is indeed a snippet and yes, Google is just an example. How should I proceed from now on? Post the whole thing as another question and delete this one, or do I edit this one, even though it has multiple comments and an answer now? | |
| Apr 29, 2020 at 15:49 | answer | added | Alex Povel | timeline score: 2 | |
| Apr 29, 2020 at 15:45 | answer | added | AJNeufeld | timeline score: 2 | |
| Apr 29, 2020 at 15:20 | comment | added | Reinderien | I am not convinced that this code is on-topic. It seems like a snippet that would never be run in isolation. CodeReview does not support the reviewing of snippets. Is this all of the code in your program, or is there more? Why are you gathering origins? Will it actually be from Google, or is that just an example? (Hypotheticals are also off-topic.) | |
| Apr 29, 2020 at 15:07 | history | edited | AJNeufeld | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Fixed title, added tag
|
| Apr 29, 2020 at 14:40 | comment | added | AJNeufeld | You cannot substantially edit the question after receiving an answer post, as doing so invalidates the answer. See the help center for what you can, should, and cannot do after receiving an answer. I have rolled back your most recent edit accordingly. | |
| Apr 29, 2020 at 14:36 | history | rollback | AJNeufeld |
Rollback to Revision 3
|
|
| Apr 29, 2020 at 10:50 | history | edited | Kate Velasquez | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 6 characters in body
|
| Apr 29, 2020 at 8:51 | history | edited | Kate Velasquez | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixes based on @ThomasWeller comment
|
| Apr 29, 2020 at 8:26 | history | edited | Kate Velasquez | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 2 characters in body
|
| Apr 29, 2020 at 7:35 | review | First posts | |||
| Apr 29, 2020 at 12:56 | |||||
| Apr 29, 2020 at 7:34 | history | asked | Kate Velasquez | CC BY-SA 4.0 |