Timeline for Intersection of sorted lists
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dec 7, 2019 at 0:07 | comment | added | Turksarama | While the terse function works I don't think it's worth the extra programmer overhead in understanding it to save 5 lines of code. | |
| Dec 6, 2019 at 1:07 | history | edited | alexyorke | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 46 characters in body
|
| Dec 5, 2019 at 23:39 | history | edited | alexyorke | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 548 characters in body
|
| Dec 5, 2019 at 3:18 | comment | added | alexyorke | @kyrill I removed it a few minutes ago; it was not working for some inputs | |
| Dec 5, 2019 at 3:17 | comment | added | kyrill |
I must say I find your new while condition quite confusing...
|
|
| Dec 5, 2019 at 3:14 | comment | added | alexyorke |
@kyrill The yield operator "returns" a value when called; the function can then be wrapped in a list() to get the same "behavior| as returning/appending a list in a loop
|
|
| Dec 5, 2019 at 3:13 | history | edited | alexyorke | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Solution doesn't work
|
| Dec 5, 2019 at 2:33 | comment | added | kyrill | And what do you mean by "return statements can be expressed as yield" ? | |
| Dec 5, 2019 at 2:30 | history | edited | alexyorke | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 10 characters in body
|
| Dec 5, 2019 at 2:30 | comment | added | kyrill | Note my first suggestion | |
| Dec 5, 2019 at 2:28 | comment | added | alexyorke | @kyrill thank you for your suggestions; I have updated my answer | |
| Dec 5, 2019 at 2:28 | history | edited | alexyorke | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 12 characters in body
|
| Dec 5, 2019 at 2:06 | history | answered | alexyorke | CC BY-SA 4.0 |