Timeline for C++ ring buffer using some C++ 17 and coming C++ 20 std::span
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
20 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Nov 17, 2023 at 2:09 | answer | added | Paul Bruner | timeline score: 0 | |
Dec 22, 2021 at 13:01 | vote | accept | dev65 | ||
Nov 25, 2019 at 12:26 | history | reopened |
L. F. Stephen Rauch Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ♦ Mast♦ konijn |
||
Nov 24, 2019 at 11:25 | review | Reopen votes | |||
Nov 25, 2019 at 12:26 | |||||
Nov 24, 2019 at 11:06 | comment | added | L. F. | Can you also add some test cases? | |
Nov 18, 2019 at 14:57 | history | closed |
πάντα ῥεῖ pacmaninbw♦ Linny RoToRa Ethan Bierlein |
Not suitable for this site | |
Nov 17, 2019 at 1:19 | history | edited | Jamal | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 18 characters in body; edited tags; edited title
|
Nov 16, 2019 at 12:45 | answer | added | dev65 | timeline score: 3 | |
Nov 15, 2019 at 18:31 | history | edited | dev65 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 1400 characters in body
|
Nov 15, 2019 at 18:25 | review | Close votes | |||
Nov 18, 2019 at 14:57 | |||||
Nov 15, 2019 at 18:20 | comment | added | dev65 | but the page says : 'If your question was asking for a review of pseudocode, then we need you to post an implementation in a real programming language' and I don't ask about reassigning vs destruct/construct generally as each has its uses . instead I ask if the method I'm using in the code for ring buffer is better than reassigning | |
Nov 15, 2019 at 18:08 | comment | added | πάντα ῥεῖ | @dev65 ^ Particularly check codereview.meta.stackexchange.com/a/3652 | |
Nov 15, 2019 at 18:07 | comment | added | pacmaninbw♦ | codereview.stackexchange.com/help/how-to-ask and codereview.stackexchange.com/help/dont-ask. | |
Nov 15, 2019 at 18:01 | comment | added | dev65 | I don't know why it's off-topic . the boost's website claims that reassigning is more efficient | |
Nov 15, 2019 at 17:56 | comment | added | pacmaninbw♦ | The name of the class and possibly the usage makes it hypothetical. We review code and suggest how it can be improved. Reassigning versus destruction/construction might be considered opinion based and off-topic. | |
Nov 15, 2019 at 17:52 | comment | added | dev65 | I don't understand what are you saying but I wrote it as an example to illustrate why I favored overwriting by destructing and constructing rather than by assigning . if you see it's better to reassign then I'll be pleased to hear your opinion | |
Nov 15, 2019 at 17:50 | history | edited | AlexV | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 17 characters in body; edited tags
|
Nov 15, 2019 at 17:46 | comment | added | pacmaninbw♦ |
The class SomeClass makes this question off-topic because it seems to be hypothetical. Is the class necessary to the question, and if it is could you better define it?
|
|
Nov 15, 2019 at 17:32 | history | edited | πάντα ῥεῖ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
Nov 15, 2019 at 17:30 | history | asked | dev65 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |