Skip to main content
deleted 86 characters in body
Source Link

I am open to any kind of feedback on code quality, and I’m still testing whether the code works logically. As of now, everything compiles and most observable cases produce the expected output. Therefore, I want the code here to be checked not for logic errors(unless there is some fatal flaw you observe) but instead for code quality. Do inform me if more code or some clarification is required for a better review. Thanks in advance.

I am open to any kind of feedback on code quality, and I’m still testing whether the code works logically. As of now, everything compiles and most observable cases produce the expected output. Therefore, I want the code here to be checked not for logic errors(unless there is some fatal flaw you observe) but instead for code quality. Do inform me if more code or some clarification is required for a better review. Thanks in advance.

I am open to any kind of feedback on code quality, and I’m still testing whether the code works logically. Therefore, I want the code here to be checked not for logic errors(unless there is some fatal flaw you observe) but instead for code quality. Do inform me if more code or some clarification is required for a better review. Thanks in advance.

added 112 characters in body
Source Link

Update

The code works now, completed the JUnit tests, whose code I won't be showing here until requested.

Update

The code works now, completed the JUnit tests, whose code I won't be showing here until requested.

added 172 characters in body
Source Link

I am open to any kind of feedback on code quality, and I’m still testing whether the code works logically. As of now, everything compiles and most observable cases produce the expected output. Therefore, I want the code here to be checked not for logic errors(unless there is some fatal flaw you observe) but instead for code quality. Do inform me if more code or some clarification is required for a better review. Thanks in advance.

I am open to any kind of feedback on code quality, and I’m still testing whether the code works logically. As of now, everything compiles. Do inform me if more code or some clarification is required for a better review. Thanks in advance.

I am open to any kind of feedback on code quality, and I’m still testing whether the code works logically. As of now, everything compiles and most observable cases produce the expected output. Therefore, I want the code here to be checked not for logic errors(unless there is some fatal flaw you observe) but instead for code quality. Do inform me if more code or some clarification is required for a better review. Thanks in advance.

Source Link
Loading