Timeline for clean approach to decorator that takes optional keyword arguments [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
15 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Oct 25, 2019 at 19:42 | history | closed |
Mast♦ Linny konijn Malachi |
Not suitable for this site | |
Oct 25, 2019 at 19:41 | comment | added | Malachi | @rabbit.aaron, where can you plug this into real production code? do you have to change anything in order to use it in "the wild"? | |
Oct 24, 2019 at 14:08 | comment | added | konijn | Greetings! I voted to close (we can always re-open later) because the code is too obviously not the real code, it is stub code. There is little (not enough) value in reviewing stub code, so we don't do that here. | |
Oct 24, 2019 at 3:05 | review | Close votes | |||
Oct 25, 2019 at 19:42 | |||||
Oct 9, 2019 at 14:00 | comment | added | rabbit.aaron | I disagree, this is working code. though the real logic isn't displayed inside the code, it serves as a template for myself to write decorators. The purpose of the code is clearly stated in my post. I do think this question complies with most of the things mentioned in the guideline here. codereview.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1954/… . if the code isn't working i would have posted it on stackoverflow. | |
Oct 9, 2019 at 9:38 | comment | added | Mast♦ | @rabbit.aaron Github. | |
Oct 9, 2019 at 9:35 | answer | added | QuantumChris | timeline score: 3 | |
Oct 9, 2019 at 4:31 | history | edited | 200_success |
edited tags
|
|
Oct 9, 2019 at 4:29 | history | edited | rabbit.aaron | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
deleted 43 characters in body
|
Oct 9, 2019 at 4:21 | history | edited | dfhwze |
edited tags
|
|
Oct 9, 2019 at 3:42 | comment | added | rabbit.aaron | hmmm it isn't really a question i just want to share this with people, where should i post it? | |
Oct 9, 2019 at 1:50 | review | Close votes | |||
Oct 9, 2019 at 4:21 | |||||
Oct 9, 2019 at 1:35 | comment | added | Reinderien | I agree with @200_success. This is borderline-hypothetical code; have a read through codereview.meta.stackexchange.com/questions/1981/… | |
Oct 9, 2019 at 1:34 | comment | added | 200_success | Code Review requires real code. Do you have a concrete use case that is not a toy example, so that we can give you proper advice? | |
Oct 9, 2019 at 1:05 | history | asked | rabbit.aaron | CC BY-SA 4.0 |