Return to Question

I've undertaken the project of creating my own programming language, Linny. It's a very, very simple language, with only variable creation, variable changing, and outputting to the console, but I've very proud of it. It's an interpreted language, with the interpreter being written in python3. The interpreter is really a hybrid of a compiler/interpreter. I can't really say where I got the idea for the syntax, I just meshed a bunch of ideas from a wide range of languages and that's what I got. I want as much criticism and nitpick as you can find. From performance to readability to bugs, anything. Any and all feedback is appreciated, welcomed, and seriously considered!

You write a program in Linny, with the file extension .linny. You set the path to the file in the source code, and you run it. You can also uncomment the bottom part in the main guard, comment out the for line in lines: interpret(line) part, and you'll be able to input line by line commands like python.

I've undertaken the project of creating my own programming language, Linny. It's a very, very simple language, with only variable creation, variable changing, and outputting to the console, but I've very proud of it. It's an interpreted language, with the interpreter being written in Python 3. The interpreter is really a hybrid of a compiler/interpreter. I can't really say where I got the idea for the syntax, I just meshed a bunch of ideas from a wide range of languages and that's what I got. I want as much criticism and nitpick as you can find. From performance to readability to bugs, anything.

You write a program in Linny, with the file extension .linny. You set the path to the file in the source code, and you run it. You can also uncomment the bottom part in the main guard, comment out the for line in lines: interpret(line) part, and you'll be able to input line by line commands like Python.

There is a follow up question here.