Timeline for Find max number you can create from an array of numbers
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 4, 2019 at 18:27 | comment | added | Eric Duminil | All good. I already upvoted yesterday. | |
| Jul 4, 2019 at 18:18 | comment | added | IEatBagels | @EricDuminil oh god.. Ahah. It looks good now? | |
| Jul 4, 2019 at 18:18 | history | edited | IEatBagels | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Jul 4, 2019 at 18:05 | comment | added | IEatBagels | @EricDuminil Thanks I changed it :) | |
| Jul 4, 2019 at 18:05 | history | edited | IEatBagels | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Jul 3, 2019 at 20:39 | comment | added | Maverick Meerkat | well, now I can't be sure... but could be. Who knows... | |
| Jul 3, 2019 at 19:56 | comment | added | Eric Duminil | You're 100% correct. The question is completely boring otherwise. See geeksforgeeks.org/… | |
| Jul 3, 2019 at 17:38 | comment | added | IEatBagels | @DavidRefaeli It's hard to tell from the statement you gave in your question and it really feels like it's wrong. Are you sure didn't just see it this way? Because as I wrote, for the example you gave both explanations work. | |
| Jul 3, 2019 at 17:33 | comment | added | Maverick Meerkat | 3222100 is the correct max number, at least I think, as I don't have the question in front of me anymore - but there were enough examples from which I understood this. I emphasized the not digits to stress that you need to break the number into digits. | |
| Jul 3, 2019 at 16:56 | history | answered | IEatBagels | CC BY-SA 4.0 |