Timeline for FizzBuzz in Javascript
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
24 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 25, 2019 at 17:45 | comment | added | Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ♦ | This question is being discussed on meta. | |
| Jan 11, 2019 at 9:34 | answer | added | Phrancis | timeline score: 3 | |
| S Jan 10, 2019 at 14:34 | history | suggested | Pedro A | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Add relevant link
|
| Jan 10, 2019 at 14:25 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Jan 10, 2019 at 14:34 | |||||
| Jan 9, 2019 at 21:00 | answer | added | GrumpyCrouton | timeline score: 4 | |
| Jan 9, 2019 at 18:42 | history | edited | Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ♦ | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
update title to describe code instead of CR goals
|
| Jan 9, 2019 at 17:07 | answer | added | Hemanshu | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 9, 2019 at 16:22 | answer | added | user106363 | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 9, 2019 at 15:05 | vote | accept | Zachary Woods | ||
| Jan 9, 2019 at 15:05 | vote | accept | Zachary Woods | ||
| Jan 9, 2019 at 15:05 | |||||
| Jan 9, 2019 at 15:05 | vote | accept | Zachary Woods | ||
| Jan 9, 2019 at 15:05 | |||||
| Jan 9, 2019 at 14:39 | comment | added | Tombo | It would be better to include the actual spec you are following. The FizzBuzz solution looks fine. Any extra points goes to how you follow the nuance of the spec. If you really wanted to get fancy, you could do it without the explicit "FizzBuzz" part of the algorithm. | |
| Jan 9, 2019 at 10:39 | comment | added | Kickstart | One possible issue is you are relying on a standard fizzbuzz using 3 and 5 (hence checking for 3 * 5 as 15). Someone might give you a test using 2 and 4 to see if you fell into the trap of checking for 8. | |
| Jan 9, 2019 at 10:22 | answer | added | Michael | timeline score: 26 | |
| Jan 9, 2019 at 9:00 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackCodeReview/status/1082925059600191488 | ||
| Jan 8, 2019 at 17:08 | history | edited | Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Jan 8, 2019 at 16:54 | answer | added | Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ♦ | timeline score: 53 | |
| Jan 8, 2019 at 16:53 | history | edited | Sᴀᴍ Onᴇᴌᴀ♦ |
edited tags
|
|
| Jan 8, 2019 at 15:51 | answer | added | Paul | timeline score: 16 | |
| Jan 8, 2019 at 15:37 | comment | added | user189829 |
You could go with var output = i; and then remove that final else block.
|
|
| Jan 8, 2019 at 15:36 | comment | added | George | It's hard to give constructive criticism on such a small, simple function. It's a reasonable solution and the only things I could pick out being wrong would be me being extremely picky or a personal preference. | |
| Jan 8, 2019 at 15:31 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Jan 8, 2019 at 15:48 | |||||
| Jan 8, 2019 at 15:27 | history | migrated | from stackoverflow.com (revisions) | ||
| Jan 8, 2019 at 15:26 | history | asked | Zachary Woods | CC BY-SA 4.0 |