Timeline for Generate 10 random 3-letter strings
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
4 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jul 19, 2018 at 0:17 | vote | accept | Koray Tugay | ||
| Jul 10, 2018 at 22:54 | comment | added | Alexander |
I would not recommend doing from random import choices. choices isn't a comprehensive enough name to stand on its own like that. random.choices(...) seems like a much more readable choice (pun intended).
|
|
| Jul 10, 2018 at 20:20 | comment | added | Graipher |
@KorayTugay It is shorter than ["".join(choice(ascii_lowercase) for _ in range(3)) for _ in range(10)]. IMO this makes it also easier to read. Whether or not it is easier to read than writing out the for loop, that depends a bit on how used you are to list comprehensions. I think this one is not yet pushing it so far as to become unreadable.
|
|
| Jul 10, 2018 at 8:37 | history | answered | Graipher | CC BY-SA 4.0 |