Timeline for Finding MinMax values and returning a tuple as a result
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 15, 2018 at 14:27 | vote | accept | Natalie Perret | ||
| Apr 15, 2018 at 10:18 | history | edited | t3chb0t |
edited tags
|
|
| Apr 15, 2018 at 10:13 | answer | added | t3chb0t | timeline score: 7 | |
| Apr 15, 2018 at 3:45 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackCodeReview/status/985363433129463809 | ||
| Apr 14, 2018 at 23:32 | answer | added | paparazzo | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 14, 2018 at 22:49 | comment | added | Natalie Perret | @t3chb0t hm alright will change that, thanks! | |
| Apr 14, 2018 at 22:49 | comment | added | Natalie Perret | @PieterWitvoet agreed, always wondering why MS didn't vote for a read-only (value type) tuples | |
| Apr 14, 2018 at 22:47 | comment | added | Pieter Witvoet | I'm not sure why you're only considering (value) tuples and classes? An immutable result without extra allocations sounds like a struct with readonly fields to me. | |
| Apr 14, 2018 at 22:23 | comment | added | t3chb0t |
LeftStrictlyLesserThanRight - I think virtually all programming languages call this just less-than and its counterpart less-than-or-equal.
|
|
| Apr 14, 2018 at 22:20 | history | edited | t3chb0t | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited the title
|
| Apr 14, 2018 at 21:54 | history | edited | Natalie Perret | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 288 characters in body
|
| Apr 14, 2018 at 21:49 | history | edited | Natalie Perret | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 288 characters in body
|
| Apr 14, 2018 at 21:47 | history | asked | Natalie Perret | CC BY-SA 3.0 |