Timeline for Selenium-based link checker for a shopping site
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
16 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Jul 18, 2017 at 0:47 | history | edited | Jamal | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 12 characters in body; edited tags
|
Apr 24, 2017 at 21:40 | comment | added | Shawn | @TravisBathurst The tool is not as important generally as a fully worked solution. Do a check for 301 and 302 redirects. :-) Happy coding. | |
Apr 24, 2017 at 21:40 | comment | added | Travis Bathurst | We do have a lot of redirects on our site. | |
Apr 24, 2017 at 21:40 | comment | added | Travis Bathurst | Thank you, not 100% sure why I started with Python. I had a buddy in high that was a real big python nerd so I figured that I would start learning that first. The reason I wanted to use selenium was because eventually I am going to build off this to check other features of my site and selenium seems to be a real good webkit for website testing. I do want to learn PHP. Figured I would get my feet wet with python first. Thank you for responding. | |
Apr 24, 2017 at 21:39 | comment | added | Shawn | (cont.) My solution will also if you check the code status on say a permanent redirect, to capture the new updated url and update yours. | |
Apr 24, 2017 at 21:31 | comment | added | Shawn | This was my solution using only curl in PHP; The reason I am including it is I show using just curl how to check for valid pages. It is possible the link will give you a temporary redirect but is still valid so you should check this condition. In addition my solution will only capture the header and will not load the full page. This will make your script super fast. I am not sure if you can do it in python but perhaps there is some useful pieces there. In my case I was using it to scan site links of around 300,000 links so speed was a concern. stackoverflow.com/a/21032909/1361532 | |
Apr 24, 2017 at 21:26 | comment | added | Travis Bathurst | Thank you, I will consider this and update my script. I appreciate you taking the time to help me. | |
Apr 24, 2017 at 18:38 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackCodeReview/status/856578060178653185 | ||
Apr 24, 2017 at 13:36 | history | edited | 200_success | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited tags; edited title
|
Apr 24, 2017 at 13:22 | answer | added | alecxe | timeline score: 4 | |
Apr 24, 2017 at 12:53 | answer | added | Graipher | timeline score: 4 | |
S Apr 24, 2017 at 12:38 | history | suggested | Martijn Pieters | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Cut away some of the chatter to focus on the actual question. Remove snippet syntax.
|
Apr 24, 2017 at 12:22 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Apr 24, 2017 at 12:38 | |||||
Apr 24, 2017 at 12:16 | comment | added | dot.Py |
IMO using ii instead of i is kinda ugly.
|
|
Apr 24, 2017 at 12:14 | history | migrated | from stackoverflow.com (revisions) | ||
Apr 24, 2017 at 12:13 | history | asked | Travis Bathurst | CC BY-SA 3.0 |